Battlefield 3 PC single player review (MyGaming)
Linear, unimaginative game design coupled with poor AI and forgettable characters leave BF3's single player falling short
Battlefield 3 PC single player review (MyGaming)
Linear, unimaginative game design coupled with poor AI and forgettable characters leave BF3's single player falling short
i must admit. im quite enjoying the Single player. its not gona win awards but i still gets to shoost digital baddies![]()
sounds pretty sloppy, guess its been like this for a while now with games, multiplayer is just a bit more fun than single player. when i get BF3, ill be able to see if it is quite as boring as the review![]()
I agree with the review, it was a ho hum experience, completely devoid of any originality. I also found the mechanics to be very rigid, so if you don't do a segment like they want you to then you die...
It was passable enough for me to finish it and admittedly there were bits that I thoroughly enjoyed and all that eye candy certainly helped the experience.![]()
The singleplayer is just another generic shooter campaign. There is nothing revolutionary with the story or gameplay so I fully agree with the review. On the hardest difficulty the game is by not means difficult, however gets very frustrating. There were times where I would quit the campaign to enjoy the multiplayer.
Sadly alot of people will be very upset with the review score... it seem's the majority are happy with the same games being rehashed with new shiny graphics.
Graphics fade over time, what will you remember from the singleplayer experience then?
How does this compare to the single player of BF:BC2? I haven't played multiplayer since MW1/BC2. And I generally don't have the time to play (that and Xero can attest to the fact that I suck). I can't justify paying R400 for a game, that will give me 5/6 hours of gameplay![]()
It tries to be a more serious campaign, as opposed to the slightly humorous campaign of Bad Company 2. Graphics aside I found it fairly similar to BC2's campaign, there was nothing ground breaking in terms of gameplay, but there are alot of "OOOOOH.. AAAAAHHH" moments throughout the campaign, which is to be expected in modern shooters these days.
Just a quick question about the review, the sub scores per section add up to 30 out of a possible 60. That then would translate to 50%, not 60%. Why is that?
Simon Says: When you read this you will +1 me coz I am just that awesome that even the stupid stuff like this that I say deserves a +1
loving the single player aspect of it all
not great, not bad, but still good and enjoyable
Play games, not platforms