Your argument extended to (male) violence against women and the belief that it is
wrong. That is a statement about personal morality and ethics.
So, to be perfectly frank, you were the one who brought morality into this particular interaction before I did. Morality is also what this entire thread is about
: what is considered preferable, what is considered good or bad behaviour, right or wrong, acceptable and unacceptable.
Regardless, the reason why violence and sex are always compared is because of the "moral offence" taken by a vast majority of
conservative people and the hypocrisy of it. Sex and nudity harm no-one in any way. Violence (which would include rape) however, does.
The argument taken in all this is that violent and sexual media can influence people; usually minors. Hence the reason for ratings organisations. The argument is then which is more harmful: violent media or sexual media. Violent media might influence minors to murder, bring guns to school, bully, stab each other etc and sexual media might influence minors to go about humping each other (let's face facts, they do this anyway).
The argument (as I've been repeating ad nauseum) is that violent media is rather tolerated far better by societies in general than sexual media. We permit it on television, in news, in gaming and while there are some vocal groups against it, it is still something well-tolerated. However, bring nudity or sex into it and censorship pops up, people cry out about indignity, shame, the effect it has on children and all sorts of nonsense.
I have, personally, always believed that the affront people take to nudity and sexual media is based on personal insecurities/jealousy/fear: that their spouses might prefer that (usually romanticised) ideal over them, that their kids might have sex with people they don't approve of, that their ideal little worlds will be shattered by a very natural and harmless (when adults act responsibly and parents take the time to educate their kids instead of pretending it doesn't exist) process.
So which would you consider to be worse? Seeing someone naked, or seeing someone killed in media or even in the real world?
Personally, I'd rather see someone naked. And I'd much rather have a society that is comfortable with nudity, sex and all that than a society that has grown complacent about violence.
We have already firmly established that in video games, a choice would be ideal although, frankly, even there it would be a laugh and a half. Who wants to play a game with a story tailored around their sensibilities? Who the hell wants to play a game that never offends, never manages to inspire a bit of controversy, never challenges your perceptions of life? Oh, that's right... conservative bigots who want the world to conform to their personal standards.
As I said before: it should be up to the developers/writers/artists/whatever what they want to put in their games and if people don't want to be exposed to it... Play something else. You know, like in
the real world. And, just like in the real world, those are the kinds of people who are far happier to have governments tell them how to live, how to raise their kids, what to do, what should be shown on television, what media should be permitted, etc than they are to be responsible adults.
So excuse me if I can't help but sigh a bit at all this
