Ultimately, the single player campaign just never really manages to be anything special
Wolfenstein
Wolfenstein
Ultimately, the single player campaign just never really manages to be anything special
Wolfenstein
It tries to be a mix between Medal of Honour and Bloodrayne.
Honestly they could have pulled this game off soooooo much better.
ID is focusing on Rage now. So this was bound to be a B class game.
I agree with you Omega but wolfenstein wasn't thier puppy, it was Raven. Raven have seemed to go downhill and haven't made a decent hit (in my opinion) in Soldier of Fortune 2 and Jedi Knight 2.
-
-
Silly me, shows how much i know about this game. Raven have been slipping of late.Originally Posted by DuncanBell
I was actually looking forward to Wolfenstein until the reviews came out.
Ok wait I lie, theres other good games they have made:
Soldier of Fortune II: Double Helix (2002)
Star Wars Jedi Knight: Jedi Academy (2003)
Quake 4 (2005)
Marvel: Ultimate Alliance (2006)
X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009)
So ja... there
-
-
SOF II sucked so badly.
SOF I was ok.
Hehe i agree with you. I actually played them the other day, and SOF2 get very very monotonous. I get pissed off in the jungle stages cos the enemies can see straight through some of the trees and bushes... Grrr...
I also enjoyed Quake4, but they should have put co-op in
-
-
Quake 4 i actually finished. Was a decent Quake squeal. I played all of 5 minutes of SOF II. Before taking it out of my old Xbox and never touched it again.Hehe i agree with you. I actually played them the other day, and SOF2 get very very monotonous. I get pissed off in the jungle stages cos the enemies can see straight through some of the trees and bushes... Grrr...
I also enjoyed Quake4, but they should have put co-op in
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
