Sony dropped PS Eye to undercut Xbox One

Sony’s strategy to exclude the PS Eye was to beat Microsoft’s price

June 27, 2013
PlayStation 4 Dualshock 4 Playstation 4 eye

The pricing debate around the Xbox One and PS4 will no doubt rage into the foreseeable future; adding fuel to that fire are reports that Sony intentionally dropped the PS Eye from the console bundle in order to undercut Microsoft’s offering.

The PS4 will retail at $399, while the Xbox One will be priced at $499, but the Xbox One features the new Kinect camera, while the PS4 doesn’t include its motion-tracking device – the PS Eye.

Multiple sources have said that Sony quietly informed retail partners ahead of E3 to exclude the camera from any mention of the PS4.

The PS Eye will be a $59.99 add-on, and without it the DualShock 4 controller’s built-in LED motion trackers are essentially useless.

What do you think? Are you happy to receive a standard console, and then buy the additional motion-tracking camera, or should it be included?

Source: IGN

More Sony news:

PS3 update 4.46 released to fix “bricked” consoles

PS4 OS runs on FreeBSD with GRUB bootloader: leak

Playstation Plus on PS4: all you need to know

Playstation 4 release date outed?

Tags: active, Microsoft, next gen, PlayStation 4, PS Eye, ps4, PS4 camera, Sony, Xbox one

Shutterstock is the image partner of MyGaming – technology images can be found here

Poll

Which PS4 exclusive are you most looking forward to?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Latest News

SA gamers’ favourite fast foods

Junk Food

The MyGaming Lifestyle Survey 2014 reveals what local gamers fill their bellies with before going into battle

PS Plus – May’s free games

payday-2-featured-1

Come and see what games PlayStation owners are getting for free in May

Destiny gets new screenshots, videos, and website

Destiny Bungie News

Bungie has released new assets for its highly anticipated online FPS

Old-school PCs vs today’s smartphones

Old-PC-TRS_80Model1

Back in the 80s, PC gaming couldn’t have been that great – considering it was done on a 320×200 resolution screen

bool(true)