ChessConquest - official discussion thread

I just lost to a person named daniel. He claimed a timeout victory on BOTH the games he challenged me too. Really annoyed by this. I only moved a single piece too

Unfortunately yes. It looks to be the Romanian players like fivel said. They (or are they all the same person?) start tons of challenges with 1 day to move and no timebank and then claim timeout victories when people don't move in time. Your best bet is to either decline challenges from them or to delete the current challenges and then challenge them with proper time settings.

Sorry to hear that it happened to you speedz. :(
 
Thanks for the headsup. I will remember this for future challenges. Its a pity, cause my stats losses show 2 more lost games and that is a poor reflection


Sent from Tapatalk
 
Thanks for the headsup. I will remember this for future challenges. Its a pity, cause my stats losses show 2 more lost games and that is a poor reflection


Sent from Tapatalk

Like solitude said, he is kinder than I am, I just delete the new games that come through, as I'm finding that my small chess brain and confidence is taking a severe beating. Out of the last 12 games I've finished, I've lost 10, mostly against the Romanians, it just isn't fun anymore.

I also note a very strange thing. On most occasions when I make a move they suddenly all are online. How is this possible?
 
I just lost to a person named daniel. He claimed a timeout victory on BOTH the games he challenged me too. Really annoyed by this. I only moved a single piece too

speedz, I can understand you feeling unhappy for losing in this way. Still, Daniel was quite within his rights to claim the victory as you were fully aware of the game; after all you made moves in both games. You had every opportunity to check out the time limits. The fact is that you made a painful mistake by not getting it right.

I suggest that you think carefully about what went wrong, and make a plan not to let it happen again. Solitude's idea of not accepting zero time bank games has merit. Putting yourself on vacation when playing zero timebank games also helps. Or maybe something else.

Just keep on enjoying the chess.
 
Tallfred, I agree with you to a certain extent, BUT all these Romanian players set a 1 day time limit, so if you are not careful about managing your vacation setting you will end up losing many of these games. IMO they do this deliberately to catch players out and that goes against the very objective of the site. I have tried to communicate with all 3, with no success.

Anyhoo, wishing you all a fantastic 2012!
 
Fivel

You don't have to accept a challenge, so use the "Delete Game" option if you don't like the player or the time limit. Nobody can catch you out if you are careful: speedz admits that he knew about the games. While we're at it, make sure that "Receive email notification when challenged" is set in your profile.

Oh yeah, and have a fantastic blunder-free 2012!
 
Fivel

You don't have to accept a challenge, so use the "Delete Game" option if you don't like the player or the time limit. Nobody can catch you out if you are careful: speedz admits that he knew about the games. While we're at it, make sure that "Receive email notification when challenged" is set in your profile.

Oh yeah, and have a fantastic blunder-free 2012!

Hear you, I still don't like their approach ;)
 
speedz, I can understand you feeling unhappy for losing in this way. Still, Daniel was quite within his rights to claim the victory as you were fully aware of the game; after all you made moves in both games. You had every opportunity to check out the time limits. The fact is that you made a painful mistake by not getting it right.

I suggest that you think carefully about what went wrong, and make a plan not to let it happen again. Solitude's idea of not accepting zero time bank games has merit. Putting yourself on vacation when playing zero timebank games also helps. Or maybe something else.

Just keep on enjoying the chess.


Yes he had every right to do so. I still feel it is a shallow victory, a victory none the less. I for one would only claim a timeout victory if the other person took an exceptionally long time to make a move, despite having a timebank. Its not as if he had no other games to play at that point in time (he was playing 31 games at the time concurrently).

Also not an excuse, but as Fivel pointed out, it seemed as if they were online all the time to make their move immediately. I myself log on once a day and somedays im just to busy. I am now aware that I should log on all the time and wont be caught off-guard like I was.

Happy new year
 
Hi everyone,

Happy happy 2012, and may you claim loads of victories this year ;)

I also note a very strange thing. On most occasions when I make a move they (the Romanians) suddenly all are online. How is this possible?

I have also been wondering about this. It could be that they wrote a tiny application that automatically visits the website addresses of their own games, and then alerts them when a move has been made. But this is just speculation.
 
Happy New Year to you too yotta!

I don't know about you guys but I was on holiday for a week. Yesterday was my first day back at work and I'm pooped. Last night I was so tired but went ahead and quickly made some moves at ChessConquest. What a big mistake! :(
 
Happy New Year to you too yotta!

I don't know about you guys but I was on holiday for a week. Yesterday was my first day back at work and I'm pooped. Last night I was so tired but went ahead and quickly made some moves at ChessConquest. What a big mistake! :(

Mistakes happen. Just keep positive. Players have come back from big disadvantages to win. There are some very interesting ideas at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swindle_(chess) on how to take a lost game and get something out of it.
 
It looks like Ramsaychess' holiday time ran out. Is it possible to maybe give him some more time? Two of the tournament games I was playing against him were automatically claimed which is unfortunate and it would have been better to finish the games.
 
It looks like Ramsaychess' holiday time ran out. Is it possible to maybe give him some more time? Two of the tournament games I was playing against him were automatically claimed which is unfortunate and it would have been better to finish the games.

Ramsay always made use of the function over weekends which is why his time ran out. Don't think it is appropriate to make an exception though.
 
Ramsay always made use of the function over weekends which is why his time ran out. Don't think it is appropriate to make an exception though.

I'm inclined to agree with Fivel on this one. If a player knows he/she cannot make moves over the weekend, they should only enter Medium Velocity and/or Epic Deep Thought tournaments.
 
I guess you guys are right. I feel bad for the guy though. Also I was playing four games against him so it's four wins that I didn't really deserve.

Hey and good news! I got Fritz 13 working! It's got an analyze feature where it analyzes games that you play. Will see if I can post an example later. It's a pretty complicated program. :D
 
I guess you guys are right. I feel bad for the guy though. Also I was playing four games against him so it's four wins that I didn't really deserve.

Hey and good news! I got Fritz 13 working! It's got an analyze feature where it analyzes games that you play. Will see if I can post an example later. It's a pretty complicated program. :D

We have total faith in your abilities to figure it all out ;)
 
Hey and good news! I got Fritz 13 working! It's got an analyze feature where it analyzes games that you play. Will see if I can post an example later. It's a pretty complicated program. :D

I'd love to compare what Fritz says with what Chessmaster says. Please post.
 
I'd love to compare what Fritz says with what Chessmaster says. Please post.

Hmmm is there any way to embed a pgn file on this forum? I will just paste the contents of the file. It's from the game that I'm the most proud of that I won against Sloth. He went on to beat me later when we played the same opening but this posted game felt like a milestone reached. The posted game is analyzed in its entirety by Fritz 13, English comments and all:

[Event "ChessConquest Game"]
[Site "www.chessconquest.com"]
[Date "2011.11.05"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Solitude"]
[Black "Sloth"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B26"]
[Annotator "Fritz 13 (30s)"]
[PlyCount "55"]
[EventDate "2011.??.??"]

{B26: Closed Sicilian: 3 g3, lines with early Be3} 1. e4 c5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. g3 g6
4. Bg2 Bg7 5. d3 Nf6 6. Be3 O-O 7. h3 d6 8. Qd2 {last book move} a6 {Covers b5}
9. Nge2 Rb8 10. O-O e6 {Prevents intrusion on d5} (10... Bd7 11. d4 cxd4 12.
Nxd4 $11) 11. f4 (11. d4 b6 $14) 11... Bd7 12. g4 {White intends f5} b5 13. Ng3
{White prepares f5} Qc7 14. Nce2 Ne8 15. f5 {White wins space} (15. c3 $142 $5
{should be investigated more closely} b4 16. f5 $11) 15... Bxb2 $17 16. fxg6 (
16. Rab1 Bg7 $15) 16... Bxa1 (16... hxg6 17. Rab1 Bg7 18. a3 $17) 17. gxh7+
Kxh7 18. Rxa1 {Black wins the exchange} Ng7 19. Rf1 f5 $4 {releasing the
pressure on the opponent} (19... f6 $142 $15 {the rescuing straw}) 20. exf5 $18
exf5 21. gxf5 $4 {with this move White loses his initiative} (21. Bh6 $142 {
White has the better game} Rg8 22. Bxg7 (22. gxf5 $143 Be8 $18) 22... Rxg7 23.
Rxf5 Bxf5 24. Nxf5 $18) 21... Nxf5 $11 22. Be4 Nce7 23. Bh6 {White threatens
to win material: Bh6xf8} Rg8 $4 {not a good decision, because now the opponent
is right back in the game} (23... d5 $142 {was a good chance to save the game}
24. Bxf8 Rxf8 (24... dxe4 $2 {is tempting, but} 25. Nxf5 Nxf5 26. Rxf5 Bxf5 27.
Qh6+ Kg8 28. Bd6 Qg7+ 29. Qxg7+ Kxg7 30. Bxb8 exd3 31. cxd3 $18) 25. Nxf5 Bxf5
$11) 24. Qf4 $18 Kh8 $4 {terrible, but the game is lost in any case} (24... Rg6
25. Bg5 Re8 $18) 25. Kh2 (25. Bg5 Rxg5 26. Qxg5 Rf8 $18) 25... Ng6 (25... Be6 {
the only chance to get some counterplay} 26. Bxf5 Nxf5 27. Nxf5 Bxf5 28. Qxf5
Qe7 $18) 26. Qg5 Nxg3 (26... Be6 27. Bxf5 Qe7 28. Bxe6 Qxg5 29. Bxg5 Rgf8 30.
Bf6+ Kh7 $18) 27. Rf7 Nxe4 (27... Nf5 {doesn't improve anything} 28. Qf6+ Rg7
29. Bxg7+ Kg8 30. Qxg6 Nh4 31. Qh7+ Kxf7 32. Bh6+ Kf6 33. Qg7+ Ke6 34. Nf4#)
28. Bg7+ $3 {Decoy: g8} (28. Bg7+ Rxg7 29. Qh6+ Kg8 30. Qxg7#) 1-0
 
Back
Top