According to most people on the internet, the game is horribly unoptimised on PC. It only uses two cores and a maximum of two threads even though they said in a interview before hand that it will make use of four to six cores. In the same interview, they promised 60FPS on a 670 with most settings turned up to the max. In reality, you'll get somewhat close to that, but it'll jump around a lot (anywhere from 40 to 60; doesn't really matter what graphics settings you use. High or low runs basically the same). Most of the people who have been able to run it at a constant 60FPS were the guys with Titans or 780's. I'll acknowledge that AC4 looks good, but it definitely shouldn't need a Titan to run it at full settings at 60FPS. The port is fine, but the optimising is definitely lacking.
I would've hoped that after AC3, which still has issues on a lot of systems, that they would've learnt their lesson. Now even though the PC version is the best looking version, and a decent port, it needs some optimisation patches. Ubisoft, seriously stop giving the job to Ubisoft Kiev, get the guys that did the Splinter Cell Blacklist, Rayman Legends or Far Cry 3 to do it. How can they be so inconsistent? It makes no sense :confused:
I'm really looking forward to playing it but when they say that they develop primary on PC, it has to be a lie. At the very least the bugs are kind of funny. The Flying Dutchman one is incredibly amusing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgVn...=youtube_gdata
Also, I heard that there was a day 1 patch. Does anyone have a link for that?
