Watch Dogs PS4, Xbox One graphics match PC high settings
According to the game’s creative director, the now-gen console version’s visuals won’t be far behind the PC counterpart
Printable View
Watch Dogs PS4, Xbox One graphics match PC high settings
According to the game’s creative director, the now-gen console version’s visuals won’t be far behind the PC counterpart
lol this guy, he really should learn when to shut the fuck up...All he is doing is pissing gamers off. So what this tells me is they've either gimped the pc version or he is just talking out of his ass, considering he also claims you'll need a minimum of 6GB ram to even run the game on PC...Ubisoft really should staple his mouth shut.
Well if that is Gameplay then it looks awesome, But why do i feel that this is optimized for Nvidia more than ATI :(
I am willing to try the PC version on a Pentium G/i3 GTX750ti and 4GB's of RAM.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Joker
The minimum specs need a Q8400
According to CPU Boss: http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core2-...l-Core-i3-4130 an i3 haswell has the same performance as it.
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?....40GHz&id=2015
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?....66GHz&id=1041
Then they go on to state: Graphics: DirectX 11 graphics card with 1 GB Video RAM – Nvidia Geforce GTX 460 or AMD Radeon HD 5770
Only 1GB of VRAM? Okay... GTX 460/HD5770 they say: http://gpuboss.com/gpus/Radeon-HD-57...eForce-GTX-460 While the two cards are similar they have varying strenths and weaknesses.
I can see a GTX 750Ti/non-Ti handle the game well enough at 720/900p maybe 1080p at a stretch, still some funky QA and marketing going on here.
@Glordit
I'll be testing it with a AMD FX8350 @4.5Ghz and a i7 4770K + i5 4670K with both a R9 290X and a 780Ti.
The thing that is really grinding me is this idiot that keeps on spewing shit, I don't think he even realizes how he is pissing off gamers.
This game has gone from "you'll need a top of the range rig with a minimum i7 and 780 to max it" to "As long as your cpu scores 9000 passmark (i5) and you have a GTX670 you'll be able to run it at ultra"
Then in the same breath he says the game won't even launch unless you have a minimum of 6GB ram..
This game is either made up of piss poor coding or he doesn't know what he is talking about.
Seriously wtf are they doing at Ubisoft? Do they not know when to stop talking...
Joker then tell me quick should i worry or not I5 Quad 8gb ram and R9 270X O.C edition will i be able to enjoy this game or not my upgrade is only in Sept or oct
Your system will play it just fine.Quote:
Originally Posted by AlienTaker
Joker and I are complaining about Watch Dogs "creative director" Jonathan Morin, that they have spewing out crap with regards to PC specs.
You'll be fine, we're just talking about this ubisoft tard that doesn't stop talking and he keeps on spewing rubbish.Quote:
Originally Posted by AlienTaker
They should put a gag order on him for the rest of his life.
Sigh, it's like your intentionally being difficult about this. PC games 99% of the time go up to ultra, high != ultra. There is also no mention of FPS. So the consoles can do it at 30FPS, but PCs can get above 100FPS. The difference is huge. If it's such a big deal to you please cancel your pre-order.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Joker
What came out of that Twitter Q&A is that Morin is not really fussed about how the game performs on PC. All they're really worried about at this point is how much they can mitigate the issues with the game on the Xbox One.
Unless they've optimised the game to require four cores by default and to not run well on a dual-core, even a Pentium G3220 should run it just fine on Low settings. If this was a completely next-gen game like The Division then I'd be less skeptical.