Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5
Results 41 to 49 of 49

Thread: 5 critically acclaimed games that reviewers were wrong about

  1. #41
    Lycanthrope's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    5,658

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Azimuth View Post
    FUCK OFF AND DIE, RANTRANTRANT.

    :<


    I also totally disagree with most of the posts in this thread.
    *SNIFF* It's okay, I still love you >.<'

    /twirls

  2. #42
    The thing that should not be Tsar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    In james car
    Posts
    17,507

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Azimuth View Post
    FUCK OFF AND DIE, RANTRANTRANT.

    :<

    Also, I totally disagree with most of Chris's article. I also totally disagree with most of the posts in this thread.

    ^5 for the inflammatory stuff, Chris! I get it. ^__________________^

    PS. Modern Warfare 2's Spec Ops was all kinds of awesome.
    The spec ops was fun

  3. #43
    MyGaming staff Subversion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    South Korea
    Posts
    365

    Default

    @ Azimuth

    Sorry I lost you with the content, but at least I managed to reel you back in with the tone :P

    @ Lycan

    I guess we'll have to agree to disagree, although I don't really understand some of your arguments. Something like Black and White, sure, its a difference of opinion. The article is, after all, opinion. But for a large amount of people, GTA4 was unplayably bugged. Maybe it was fine for you and thats great, but a game with that many game-breaking bugs, for so many people, simply does not deserve a score in the 90s.

    And how can you disagree about a game you didn't even play? =/

    Still, was cool debating this with you At least we have something in common - a passion for games we love (or hate!)
    @BananaSub on Twitter

  4. #44
    Lycanthrope's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    5,658

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subversion View Post
    @ Lycan

    I guess we'll have to agree to disagree, although I don't really understand some of your arguments. Something like Black and White, sure, its a difference of opinion. The article is, after all, opinion. But for a large amount of people, GTA4 was unplayably bugged. Maybe it was fine for you and thats great, but a game with that many game-breaking bugs, for so many people, simply does not deserve a score in the 90s.
    Because: Planescape had bugs, Arcanum had bugs, Gothic had bugs, Fallout 1 & 2 had bugs, Temple of Elemental Evil had bugs, Vampire: The Masquerade - Bloodlines had bugs. Bugs don't make a good game bad unless they're game-breaking ones (for the majority) because I feel bugs can be patched, even unofficially. I feel that rating a game badly because your (general 'your') PC couldn't run it isn't rating the game anywhere near as much as it is rating your PC's ability to run the game.

    Do you understand what I mean?

    Perhaps an ideal would be differing ratings for gameplay and stability :3 Regardless, as I said before, 8.1 average of 8,500-odd users indicates that more people didn't have problems than those who did and therefore, despite (or, if you'd prefer, in spite of) the bugs/performance/whatever, it was still considered good.

    And how can you disagree about a game you didn't even play? =/
    I'm disagreeing based on the facts presented to me: that Fable 2 is largely much of the same. If it's what brought appeal to the first game I don't get why this is a bad thing

    Still, was cool debating this with you At least we have something in common - a passion for games we love (or hate!)
    Happy to oblige

  5. #45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tinman View Post
    Chris is really just pointing out critically acclaimed games which didn’t do it for him. Anyone could write a similar article. Mine would include Gears of War, Unreal, Quake, Dragon Age, Half Life and many, many more.
    Quote Originally Posted by Wlad View Post
    And all this time I thought I was the only person who doesn't like Half Life
    What a relief I'm not alone.

    Gears Of War is the epitome of what this article is all about IMO

  6. #46

    Default

    Thank goodness gaming is not a religion. Some posters here would've gladly killed and maimed for their beliefs.

  7. #47
    Lycanthrope's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    5,658

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Juice View Post
    Thank goodness gaming is not a religion. Some posters here would've gladly killed and maimed for their beliefs.
    Uh... Like whom exactly? Don't recall anyone saying anything that die-hard.

    Regardless, some people like discussing politics, religion, cars or whatever interest they have, others like discussing games. An interest can be passionate. As I said, I don't recall anyone here willing to kill or maim

  8. #48
    The Piper Necuno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    10,306

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Juice View Post
    Thank goodness gaming is not a religion. Some posters here would've gladly killed and maimed for their beliefs.
    in the name of Gears of War i keeel you
    // Previously known as Blind Faith or Pr⊕phet
    // Sign up to Greenman Gaming and get $2 FREE in-store credit.

  9. #49

    Default

    I never understood the whole HALO hype :/ Just like Gears of War.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •