Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: AMD confirms dual GPU DX11 card

  1. #11
    Weasley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Kempton Park
    Posts
    2,674

    Default

    only reason i want one is my 4870 512 is strugeling a bit at 1080p res with the latest games(demisgod as example)

  2. #12
    phoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    East London
    Posts
    5,043

    Default

    Would you not rather lower your resolution than cough up what is likely to be a fair amount of money in order to play the latest games NOW.
    =|This space for rent|=

  3. #13
    The Piper Necuno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    10,306

    Default

    still pointless, imho mature the current great game engines like u3, crysis and cod4.
    // Previously known as Blind Faith or Pr⊕phet
    // Sign up to Greenman Gaming and get $2 FREE in-store credit.

  4. #14
    phoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    East London
    Posts
    5,043

    Default

    I agree wholeheartedly, Necuno, but I think nvidia and AMD would prefer to see people buy new hardware with more go-faster stripes so that boost their framerates well past the point where it is relevant. [the human eye cannot distinguish the difference in framerates above 30 fps, not so?]
    =|This space for rent|=

  5. #15
    No Hobbits Allowed Isengard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    8,409

    Default

    I keep hearing that we cant distinguish the difference, but I can so easily tell when a game is running at 60fps or at 30. I need that explained to me.

  6. #16
    The Piper Necuno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    10,306

    Default

    ...well ninjas can see at 40 000 fps ? (it was it there movement speed...lol)
    // Previously known as Blind Faith or Pr⊕phet
    // Sign up to Greenman Gaming and get $2 FREE in-store credit.

  7. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Necuno View Post
    ...well ninjas can see at 40 000 fps ? (it was it there movement speed...lol)
    it wasn't movement speed, it was area of effect!

  8. #18
    Zerg Gaurdian Keldarza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Isengard View Post
    I keep hearing that we cant distinguish the difference, but I can so easily tell when a game is running at 60fps or at 30. I need that explained to me.
    Well, actually it's at about 72fps that is the max before you cant notice a difference

    How I understand it is that you can only process 30fps, but doent mean you can absorb more than that in information. You eyes "burn" in the image, but at 30fps, it's exactly what you can process, but be "burnt in image" is a single frame. Increasing this makes more frames "burnt" into the eye, and gives a motion blur effect which your brain is used to seeing. So you can tell that it seems "smoother" because of the motion blur (and saturation of colours) that is getting processed. So it feels more natural to your brain.
    Wait... what?

  9. #19
    HANDsolo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    1,062

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phoenix View Post
    Would you not rather lower your resolution than cough up what is likely to be a fair amount of money in order to play the latest games NOW.
    Blasphemy!!

  10. #20
    No Hobbits Allowed Isengard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    8,409

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Keldarza View Post
    Well, actually it's at about 72fps that is the max before you cant notice a difference

    How I understand it is that you can only process 30fps, but doent mean you can absorb more than that in information. You eyes "burn" in the image, but at 30fps, it's exactly what you can process, but be "burnt in image" is a single frame. Increasing this makes more frames "burnt" into the eye, and gives a motion blur effect which your brain is used to seeing. So you can tell that it seems "smoother" because of the motion blur (and saturation of colours) that is getting processed. So it feels more natural to your brain.
    Thanks for that, finally clears up that issue for me .

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •