Ghostbusters on PS3 lags behind 360 version; developer explains

[Dohc-WP]

maybe their quality are almost pretty much the same its probably just that PS3 has a bit more of a blur in their Devs or something....

this is the reason

"For the record, the PS3 version [of Ghostbusters] is softer due to the 'quincunx' antialiasing filter and the fact we render at about 75% the resolution of the 360 version. So you cannot directly compare a screen shot of one to the other unless you scale them properly. The PS3 does have less available RAM than the 360 – but we managed to squeeze 3 out of 4 textures as full size on the PS3."

[sycogrim]

OK sorry jeez i missed some of that but still i suppose PS3 could have done better or atleast worked around that problem...

[Dohc-WP]

Xbox FTW !!!!

[sycogrim]

Xbox FTW !!!!

PS3 FTW now GTFO jk

[kokaine]

I can use this to piss off my friends that own PS3's, hehehe

[Blackhand]

That blur looks like some REALLY poorly done blur filter that is used to cover up aliasing in games where hardware anti-aliasing is not an option. Normally because of hardware limitations or the game uses a deferred rendering engine.

As can be seen, blur filters to cover up aliasing looks like garbage, especially when your adding blur to low res textures (look at that carpet). Blur to add depth of field and motion blur is another story.

IMO, both screenshots look pretty bad. The resolution and aliasing even in the 360 shot is horrible. They should have definatly spent more time optimizing.

[Damienalexi]

Weird. I've realized that most xbox games support full 1080p, where ps3 about 40% of the games support 1080p, most of them support 720p. Anyway played the xbox version and I loved it. It was funny, great looking and gives enough hours of pleasure. Everything you would look for in a perfect date