I love how certain devs and biased publications use a single game to make huge generalizations about competing hardware.
The games could look identical if proper development time was set aside for each.
But, if this is the way they want to play it, let's see how God of War 3 looks on X360. Oh, wait...
Or how Gears of War3 will look on the PS3. Oh, wait....Originally Posted by RustPuppet
Biased ???
What's biased about this:
They're basically saying the developer screwed up. Biased publication.......?So: is the PS3 "maxed out"? Or is Terminal Reality's engine – despite comments to the contrary – just not up to snuff on the PS3? With most recent multiplatform titles performing comparably, if not identically, on both the Xbox 360 and PS3 consoles, we'd be inclined to agree with Mr. Leadbetter: it's like "time-warping back to the dawn of PS3 development" when PS3 games were routinely outperformed by their Xbox 360 counterparts.If you say so.
What get me lol-ing is this:
How the hell did they (Terminal Reality) create a under performing version of the game whilst knowing that $ony is the EU publisher and franchise owner of Ghostbusters?!?!?Let's hope the irony of the situation is lost on Ghostbusters' exclusive European publisher ... Sony. As well as the franchise's owner ... Sony Pictures.
I wasn't referring to this article in particular.
were you referring to the poster ?
Sony acquired the exclusive publishing rights just before it was released. The game was already complete by that point.
Posting Permissions
