Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: EA blames Steam's “restrictive terms of service” for Battlefield 3 no-show

  1. #1
    MyGaming Alumnus James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    MyGaming Hive
    Posts
    12,047

    Default EA blames Steam's “restrictive terms of service” for Battlefield 3 no-show

    EA blames Steam's “restrictive terms of service” for Battlefield 3 no-show

    But they’re hoping to “work out an agreement”

  2. #2

    Default

    I don't see it happening. EA wants to bypass Steam and sell their DLC in-game. That's goes against Steam's rules. Simple as that. EA isn't going to back down and sell their DLC through Steam, and Steam isn't going to change their rules for one selfish brat.

  3. #3
    RoosTa's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    255

    Default

    EA wants to have exclusive distribution rights over their games. I believe they wanted to get rid of their games off of Steam and 'move' them exclusively to Origin.

    I think they tested Valve and purposefully released Crysis' DLC exclusively to D2D. Now they trying to make out as if Valve is the 'bad guy'. This is a lot easier than pulling the plug themselves with less "PR" consequence. If they really wanted to remain on Steam, I doubt they would have made the same "mistake" twice (DA2)?

  4. #4

    Default

    Yeah, they're just looking for an easy way to make their games Origin exclusive. As far as I know, most other digital distributors don't incorporate the games into their service like Steam does, so if BF3 is on Steam, it means it won't work with Origin. If it's on, say, Gamersgate, you'd still have to install Origin to play the game, because gamersgate merely lets you download the game, not play it through their service.

  5. #5

    Default

    Mighty convenient how EA is suddenly bothered by the steam restrictions shortly after launching its own online distribution service...

  6. #6
    RoosTa's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    255

    Default

    There there is also this to consider (taken from Origin TOS):

    We do not guarantee that any Content or Entitlement will be available at all times or at any given time or that we will continue to offer particular Content or Entitlements for any particular length of time. We reserve the right to change and update Content and Entitlements without notice to you. If you have not used your Entitlements or Account for twenty four (24) months or more and your Account has associated Entitlements, your Entitlements will expire and your Account may be cancelled for non-use. Once you have redeemed your Entitlements, that content is not returnable, exchangeable, or refundable for other Entitlements or for cash, or other goods or services.
    http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=348846

  7. #7

    Default

    As an outsider its kind of hard to say who is to blame for what until either Valve or EA makes public exactly what it is they are disagreeing on, which is not going to happen.

    "Unfortunately, Steam has adopted a set of restrictive terms of service which limit how developers interact with customers to deliver patches and other downloadable content. No other download service has adopted these practices.". That's still quite vague. In what way does the way EA delivers "patches and other downloadable content" conflict with Valve's terms of service. As outsiders all we can do is speculate really.

    It could be EA trying to be "evil", or Valve's TOS might have an unnecessary hoop to jump through that they may need to re-evaluate.

  8. #8
    The Piper Necuno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    10,306

    Default

    jeez EA is a bunch of fucking crybabies *shakes head*
    // Previously known as Blind Faith or Pr⊕phet
    // Sign up to Greenman Gaming and get $2 FREE in-store credit.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blackhand View Post
    It could be EA trying to be "evil", or Valve's TOS might have an unnecessary hoop to jump through that they may need to re-evaluate.
    Nah, Valve's ToS merely state that content for games hosted on Steam has to be delivered through Steam. Steam then takes 30% of the money made from the sale for themselves, which I think is fair, because they have to pay for bandwidth used when players download the games. EA tried to bypass this by rule by selling DLC for their games in-game, therefore bypassing Steam entirely. This means Steam would host content they don't get any money for, which is unfair towards Steam. EA has to sell their DLC through Steam so Steam can take their 30% cut. EA was very much aware of this when they started selling their DLC in-game, which leads me to think it's a purposeful move on EA's part, so that they don't have to outright pull their games from Steam.

    It's also funny that EA never had issues with this rule until after they launched Origin.

  10. #10
    MOnk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    KZN
    Posts
    2,985

    Default

    Thing is there have been plenty of games hosted on Steam which didn't sell their DLC through Steam, namely many of the GFWL games like Bioshock 2 and Fallout 3. Even Dragon Age Origins didn't and still doesn't have it's DLC available for purchase through Steam.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •