Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Full Steam Ahead – or not (Column)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default

    The issue isn't that the image is offensive, the issue is that it's NSFW. Even if the picture is 80% obscured, there's still enough of it visible to be able to potentially give someone who passes by your workstation a wrong idea. It's much the same reason why I avoid going to sites that is known to have ads for "hot gurl wallpeppers" or similar while I'm at university or an internet cafe.

    Besides, what is the point of putting up an underwear model on a gaming news and review site in the first place? I don't quite get why it was deemed necessary. This isn't FHM's site. There's a difference between having half-dressed gaming girls from popular games up when it's actually related to an article, but a Victoria's Secret underwear model about Steam offline mode? Seriously?
    Last edited by Graal; 01-02-2012 at 08:57 AM.

  2. #2
    Much write, very gaming qornea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    MyGaming hamster cage.
    Posts
    2,167

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Graal View Post
    The issue isn't that the image is offensive, the issue is that it's NSFW. Even if the picture is 80% obscured, there's still enough of it visible to be able to potentially give someone who passes by your workstation a wrong idea. It's much the same reason why I avoid going to sites that is known to have ads for "hot gurl wallpeppers" or similar while I'm at university or an internet cafe.

    Besides, what is the point of putting up an underwear model on a gaming news and review site in the first place? I don't quite get why it was deemed necessary. This isn't FHM's site. There's a difference between having half-dressed gaming girls from popular games up when it's actually related to an article, but a Victoria's Secret underwear model about Steam offline mode? Seriously?
    Noted. Hence the image has been change. Again, I'm sorry you interpreted as such, it was not the intention. Shall we move on, then?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •