It is acceptable to perv over a hot girl in a skimpy costume. Just don't dare give her a score out of 10.Originally Posted by Grimspoon
Whats the big deal? I don't get.
It is acceptable to perv over a hot girl in a skimpy costume. Just don't dare give her a score out of 10.Whats the big deal? I don't get.
Here is the issue:Whats the big deal? I don't get.
SourceJust as the backlash over that Hitman trailer dies down, something else pops up to cause an outrage regarding the female form. Yes, CVG, in their infinite wisdom, decided to take time out of its E3 reporting for a spot of babe-rating. Yes, what better way to stir up the misogynistic bottom feeders in the gaming community by showing pics of booth babes and asking folk to score them. Though childish at best, perhaps the most offensive thing about the whole article was the opening paragraph in which this bastion of games journalism clarified its complex scoring system: ‘Would’ and ‘Wouldn’t with yours, mate’.
In an industry that is slowly becoming more inclusive, with games making more of a grudging effort to include women in roles bigger than their bra size (fighting genre excepted – that’s a lost cause), this is something of a surprise. Twitter, doing what it does best, exploded over the article and many, including seasoned journos such as John Walker from RPS, wrote to CVG to express their disgust. The article has since vanished from the front page, but not before making the news itself on industry sites such as gamesindustry.biz. What the article’s author was thinking is perhaps best left to the imagination… we can only assume that he left his head in another castle, perhaps in the possession of the nth pink princess that needed rescuing. CVG, coming to you, sponsored by Grainger Games…
Aaah, I think I tl;dr'ed the article, but with a scoring system of "I would" and "i wouldn't" I can understand how they would be unimpressed.
Missing the point someone is.....
But here I am, writing about this article anyway. Not because I’m a games journalist, who shrugs at CVG’s so-called games journalism, but because I’m a woman who feels violated. A woman who feels like beating some sense into the author, who obviously disregards women, and how they’re portrayed. I know it comes as no surprise that CVG would do this (they’ve done it before, even with the same author). In the end, however, this isn’t about showing pictures of booth babes wearing an absolute minimum of clothes, but it’s about how one article wrongly justifies sexism across an entire industry and ignores any previous attempts to do the exact opposite.SourceI’m absolutely horrified that someone would think that it’s perfectly acceptable to publish several pictures of women as obvious sexual objects, especially when the article begins with the following sentence:
“We here on CVG like to use a 10-point review system, but if you’re more simple-minded you could just settle with ‘would’ or ‘not with yours, mate’.”
Go read her entire piece and maybe, just maybe you will understand its about something a little bigger.
My thoughts exactly. It's part of the whole experience.
I don't see why they don't just add a few "booth boys" to even things out. You're never going to change the fact that people use sex to sell stuff, but you can at least do it without being sexist.
The girls are there to be objects of desire. If she is hot "I would" flashes across many heterosexual males minds (well, I would in my dreams in any way). If she is not, then the opposite. It shouldn't be a crime to say that a girl is hot but thanks to the PC feminazis, men are starting to feel ashamed for feeling basic male urges.
Next E3 there will be a compulsory 30 min kumbaja session every day just after the breaking of the fast.
How does it feel to be a Stereotype, I've always wondered.
EDIT: Here is a link that expresses exactly what is wrong with you comment.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/vide.../5436-Not-Okay
Last edited by OmegaFenix; 11-06-2012 at 03:18 PM.
Oh lol. You sound like a real catch.
What's ironic is that you still don't get the point, either because you are quite unable to do so, or because you simply don't want to.
Omega, I wouldn't waste any more time on this guy. He's the type of person who clearly isn't going to change.
Last edited by Graal; 11-06-2012 at 03:39 PM.
The fact that you just said that means you automatically lose this discussion.
But good job on involving Hitler and the Nazi Party.
Which stereotype by the way, there are quite a few out there. My guess would be normal everyday hot blooded male.
This has nothing to do with Hitler or the nazis. UD is your friend.
Or maybe I am just tired of being so PC I have to excrement myself because men are losing their spines.
Last edited by Crowley; 11-06-2012 at 03:47 PM.
Posting Permissions
