http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2...ple-v-samsung/
OMG that was quick. How long did Google and Oracle hash it out?
Jury was really fast in deciding this. You can bet on it that Samsung is going to appeal.
Apple vs. Samsung - Finished (until the appeal)
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2...ple-v-samsung/
OMG that was quick. How long did Google and Oracle hash it out?
Jury was really fast in deciding this. You can bet on it that Samsung is going to appeal.
Re: Apple vs. Samsung - Finished (until the appeal)
So in the USA, jury finds for Apple. In Korea, court finds for Samsung - who knows where this will end up in the end - dead zone markets - no apples in Korea, no, Samsung in USA
/popcorn/ - hope I live long enough to see how this ends - I only have another 45 years or so left (barring accidental death)
Well that sucks!If Apple had their way then I would have had to settle for their puny little iPhone 4S!!
Pretty happy with my S3 and just found the iPhone too small.
Not another thread....
Originally Posted by Enlightened End
// Previously known as Blind Faith or Pr⊕phet
// Sign up to Greenman Gaming and get $2 FREE in-store credit.
It's begs the questions of what should be patentable. The whole "bounce-back-at-the-end" one seems a bit generic, while Samsung claims about Apple trying to basically patent a rectangle is also extreme. Still, should software ideas such as finger swipes be viable as patents?
Round and Round the appeals goes, who will win? Nobody knows.
BTW, don't know why Apple is going for injunction. Really no point, Samsung will probably discontinue those models and make new one to spam the market by this time next month.
Posting Permissions
