Self Importance

[ViperGTI]

This ignore list that I keep hearing about... how does it work? Does it simply hide the posts of members on that list?
(No, I'm not add Whisper to the list... I'm just asking)

[MalicE]

[Saint_Dee]

For Graal

[Lycanthrope]

This whole episode reminds me of primary school playgound stuff............oh the drama!

Look, I'll take what drama I can get. It doesn't have to be anything fancy

[Fivel]

Look, I'll take what drama I can get. It doesn't have to be anything fancy

You really have to lift your standards!

[Murph]

[Lycanthrope]

You really have to lift your standards!

Nonsense. The harmless drama is the best sort. Any better standard and there's bound to be some serious snot and tears to be had.

At least in dramas like this you know that the worst that can happen is a bit of a bruised ego

[TheAvenged87]

Yes.

This ignore list that I keep hearing about... how does it work? Does it simply hide the posts of members on that list?
(No, I'm not add Whisper to the list... I'm just asking)

Yeah, just shows that the user has posted, doesn't show the post. I am so happy that we have this technology.

[Whisper]

Your sheer desperation to protest what you feel was an injustice done to you and your complete overreaction seems to indicate otherwise. Else I figure you would've just ignored this thread, MOnk and everyone in it.

But *shrug*...

Keep your head screwed on correctly and shit like this can be avoided in the first place.

Then let me clarify. I don't care what the (and let me quote this verbatim) "arrogant, elitist pricks" on the forum (some of the PM's even referred to specific people by name, but I don't want to cause more drama by naming them) think about me. My entirely justified reaction to this thread was because a). he hid it (I wouldn't have had a problem if he just kept the post up, because I could easily just explain what happened and refute it, which I could only do several posts later, but of course, most people didn't read that bit), and b). My friends saw someone badmouthing me, but they didn't understand what it was about. I don't take kindly to people trying to ruin my friendships (even if the accusations turned out to be cardboard-thin).

That's literally all. I don't care about your opinion of me, unless you're my friend.

Then the fact that he brought something like this, which doesn't matter to anyone and isn't anyone's business to the forum just to whine about a girl blocking him (and being entirely justified in doing so, especially after what I've learned about him post-thread), and people actually supporting him? That's cool, I get it, you're friends, you've known him longer than me, I don't care about that. It's all cool, so let's move on. I have no interest in "converting" anyone.

The thread helped me make new friends, so I'm not bothered.

>>
>>


And lastly, for the record, if I'd seen Monk's reply to me (in Steam, after I said I was going to block him), I wouldn't have blocked him, but since I already blocked him, there was no way I could see it. So how does that screenshot make sense unless he doctored it? I am willing to accept that Steam somehow still allows you to send messages to people after they've blocked you, but I am going to need proof, so I'll test this out later (anyone else is free to do the same).

This'll be my last post here, except to confirm/deny the theory above. I'd love to keep fanning the flames for your "entertainment", but I think everything that needed to be said (and quite a few things that didn't) have been said.

[Saint_Dee]

Then let me clarify. I don't care what the (and let me quote this verbatim) "arrogant, elitist pricks" on the forum (some of the PM's even referred to specific people by name, but I don't want to cause more drama by naming them) think about me. My entirely justified reaction to this thread was because a). he hid it (I wouldn't have had a problem if he just kept the post up, because I could easily just explain what happened and refute it, which I could only do several posts later, but of course, most people didn't read that bit), and b). My friends saw someone badmouthing me, but they didn't understand what it was about. I don't take kindly to people trying to ruin my friendships (even if the accusations turned out to be cardboard-thin).

That's literally all. I don't care about your opinion of me, unless you're my friend.

Then the fact that he brought something like this, which doesn't matter to anyone and isn't anyone's business to the forum just to whine about a girl blocking him (and being entirely justified in doing so, especially after what I've learned about him post-thread), and people actually supporting him? That's cool, I get it, you're friends, you've known him longer than me, I don't care about that. It's all cool, so let's move on. I have no interest in "converting" anyone.

The thread helped me make new friends, so I'm not bothered.

>>
>>


And lastly, for the record, if I'd seen Monk's reply to me (in Steam, after I said I was going to block him), I wouldn't have blocked him, but since I already blocked him, there was no way I could see it. So how does that screenshot make sense unless he doctored it? I am willing to accept that Steam somehow still allows you to send messages to people after they've blocked you, but I am going to need proof, so I'll test this out later (anyone else is free to do the same).

This'll be my last post here, except to confirm/deny the theory above. I'd love to keep fanning the flames for your "entertainment", but I think everything that needed to be said (and quite a few things that didn't) have been said.

Madam, you are now derailing the thread, we are all about unicorns now

Post a unicorn, nothing more and nothing less