Assassin’s Creed 3 review (Xbox 360)
Revolution or a faded memory?
Assassin’s Creed 3 review (Xbox 360)
Revolution or a faded memory?
Must resist till tuesday
This is really starting to suck, internet is one huge minefield of spoilers.
My ignore list: n/a
Can't say I agree with this review but everyone is entitled to his opinion.
Apart from some glitches (I've only encountered one so far), this is truly a worthy game and I'm not regretting a moment I've spent on it or the money it cost me.
The long intro is not as unnecesary as many people claim either as newcomers to the series need some orientation and people such as myself who have played them all also need to get familiar with the new mechanics.
I could go on but think each person should decide for himself.
Nothing is permitted, everything is true.
I read it, good review as alwaysbut you never mentioned the multiplayer....
I usually don't review multiplayer as most games require an entirely separate review to cover all the extra elements.
If demand is high enough I might scribble something up![]()
I could not agree with this review more. It had some brilliant eye candy and some magnificent set-pieces, but the actual story (Both Connor's and Desmond's) were no existent. The worst part for me has to be Desmond's ending, it made no sense, didn't stick to any of the themes that all previous AC games stuck to and was just sloppy. One very lack-luster ending to what could have been one of the best trilogies in gaming history.
"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, to make it possible."
- T.E. Lawrence