Quote Originally Posted by Ike_009 View Post
I'm with Fivel here, not that the other guy makes sense with his interchangeable use of uncapped and unthrottled .
Personally I feel its better to stand up for 90% of users who's service, that their also paying for FYI, is being eroded vs the 10% who are constantly making excessive use of their uncapped status.

Then again they could always ban accounts downloading off torrents instead of being a party to IP theft and regulate usage that way. Maybe I should pass that idea forward and we can get over this throttleing issue for good.

End of the day Mweb still need to make some money so they can pay wages to their employees and pay returns to those who invested in their company. It's not like their costs are Rnil and if they need to regulate their industry to prevent bad service and/ or foreclosure then I don't see the issue. End of the day this is a business and they have an obligation to all their stakeholders, not just those users who pirate illegal content like there's no tomorrow.

FYI I will not respond to any attempts to bring me further into this debate beyond this post
I agree completely. I think also that people are getting confused with uncapped and unthrottled being the same thing. I also think that the amount of data being used isn't necessarily the problem here, it is the network being congested during peak times by people who have high broadband demand p2p downloads running 24/7.