I wonder if the Xbone's 30fps is then a result of less optimization? Did a quick google on United Front Games and it doesn't look like they've had any experience working on AAA titles (unless Sleeping Dogs is AAA?).
I wonder if the Xbone's 30fps is then a result of less optimization? Did a quick google on United Front Games and it doesn't look like they've had any experience working on AAA titles (unless Sleeping Dogs is AAA?).
Sleeping Dogs is definitely AAA.Originally Posted by brendanvb
xbone is just plain weaker. Not by much...but it is.
i suspect some devs havent started fully utilising the esram yet !
Perhaps. I suspect we'll see broadly similar optimization gains on both consoles though & thus the xbone will continue to fall behind.
If I'm wrong on that front then that would indicate a bright future for APUs though. (Which imo is going to happen anyway).
Exactly you always here about xbox fans saying they haven't utilized this and that, but remember that both machines are made by amd so do people think that xbox is going to get performance gains over the playstation4.Whatever gains are made by devs on xbox can easily be applied to ps4 because of the similar architecture's.
Correction ! only the CPU's are MADE by AMD and the cpu's are not exactly alike in both systems.
The APU is designed by AMD which includes the cpu and gpu on both systems.Ps4 GPU has more CU's (Compute units).
The CPU and GPU's are both AMD (combined APU) and they are indeed built on exactly the same architecture, so just like a Radeon 7750 is the same architecture and the 7850, the one just has a higher count of the same "stuff" so it's inherently faster.
PC enthusiasts would understand exactly the kind of technical lead the PS4 has over the Xbox One and no amount of software optimisation is going to close that gap.
Posting Permissions
