The Myths Of Graphics Card Performance

[Razor88]

184ms, 190 odd the second time...

[Nemesis]

I got 3.4 seconds.. explain my BF4 KD....

If all else fails just say the other guys hack I'm going with the old age excuse.

[Tydmors]

thanks for sharing Joker.

[DarthMol]

267ms response time - so I guess I do alright in shooters despite my slower reflexes.

[Stunt]

I like Tom's... Helps being biased towards Intel and nVidia myself

[The Joker]

I like Tom's... Helps being biased towards Intel and nVidia myself

lol yeah but it makes them look like idiots and dishonest.

[Gouko_Tenrou]

Tom's Hardware has been helpful to me in the past.

Also prefer Intel & Nvidia

[The Joker]

Tom's Hardware has been helpful to me in the past.

Also prefer Intel & Nvidia

Nothing wrong with preferring one brand over another, its your choice after all, but when a site that reviews hardware does it, how can you ever trust anything they write?

[addam]

Interesting article, did any of you do the Human Benchmark? Visual Test

I got a 301 average.

- - - - - - - - - - Double Post Merged - - - - - - - - - -

Nothing wrong with preferring one brand over another, its your choice after all, but when a site that reviews hardware does it, how can you ever trust anything they write?

Maybe they should have a section telling people the CPU and GPU the writer uses, so people can sort of see which direction they may be biased towards. Obviously it's hard to be completely unbiased, but some articles there do go too far and just seem to bash AMD.

[Kwaai]

I got a 301 average.

After playing some counter strike my average dropped by 30ms