Watch Dogs PS4, Xbox One graphics match PC high settings
According to the game’s creative director, the now-gen console version’s visuals won’t be far behind the PC counterpart
Watch Dogs PS4, Xbox One graphics match PC high settings
Watch Dogs PS4, Xbox One graphics match PC high settings
According to the game’s creative director, the now-gen console version’s visuals won’t be far behind the PC counterpart
Join the MyGaming Steam group || Find out how to enter MyGaming Steam Community Giveaways
lol this guy, he really should learn when to shut the fuck up...All he is doing is pissing gamers off. So what this tells me is they've either gimped the pc version or he is just talking out of his ass, considering he also claims you'll need a minimum of 6GB ram to even run the game on PC...Ubisoft really should staple his mouth shut.
Eat - Sleep - Overclock - Repeat
I am willing to try the PC version on a Pentium G/i3 GTX750ti and 4GB's of RAM.Originally Posted by The Joker
The minimum specs need a Q8400
According to CPU Boss: http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core2-...l-Core-i3-4130 an i3 haswell has the same performance as it.
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?....40GHz&id=2015
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?....66GHz&id=1041
Then they go on to state: Graphics: DirectX 11 graphics card with 1 GB Video RAM – Nvidia Geforce GTX 460 or AMD Radeon HD 5770
Only 1GB of VRAM? Okay... GTX 460/HD5770 they say: http://gpuboss.com/gpus/Radeon-HD-57...eForce-GTX-460 While the two cards are similar they have varying strenths and weaknesses.
I can see a GTX 750Ti/non-Ti handle the game well enough at 720/900p maybe 1080p at a stretch, still some funky QA and marketing going on here.
Last edited by Glordit; 22-05-2014 at 07:11 PM.
Sigh, it's like your intentionally being difficult about this. PC games 99% of the time go up to ultra, high != ultra. There is also no mention of FPS. So the consoles can do it at 30FPS, but PCs can get above 100FPS. The difference is huge. If it's such a big deal to you please cancel your pre-order.
When an anti-piracy method is affecting the game for people who legitimately bought it and causing other people not to buy the game, there is obviously something wrong with it!
Nvm not gonna bother with a response to this.
Last edited by The Joker; 23-05-2014 at 10:22 AM.
Eat - Sleep - Overclock - Repeat
No, firstly graphics isn't everything to me. I've played MUDs for years and they are some of my best gaming memories. Secondly, you sound like a broken tape recorded and don't take anything that the guy says for face value. He says high is comparable to the console, not the best setting is comparable to the best setting. You take no mention of my post about the frame rate. You take no mention of the fact that they've said several times that you can't compare a day screenshot in one area to a nigh screenshot in another area where it's raining. You also can't compare the consoles to PCs directly and let's face facts: for most of the screen shots we have no idea which platform it's running on.
I'm not a fan boy, but I'm really looking forward to this game which for all intents and purposes looks to be an awesome game. Sure it's graphics might end up being slightly worse than they originally marketed, but it might also not be. I am however 100% sure that that won't be the deciding factor for me whether or not it will be an awesome game.
I have respect for Ubisoft for deciding to delay the game because they weren't happy with the state it was in, this delay cost them a crap load of money and they took it on the chin.
I have respect for Ubisoft for realizing that always-online is a failed concept and actually removing it from their games.
Watch Dogs will be an awesome game irrespective of whether the graphics is holy-sh1t amazing, or just great.
When an anti-piracy method is affecting the game for people who legitimately bought it and causing other people not to buy the game, there is obviously something wrong with it!
I think the issue that Joker is having is not purely the graphical fidelity of the game; but rather the fact that Ubisoft is sending extremely mixed messages about the graphics. I do agree that if the game is truly amazing then the graphics need not blow me away; however it doesn't inspire confidence in the product that every few weeks they are changing their story. Also a delay in production schedule does not equal to a great game. The game is out on Tuesday so let's reserve judgement ,positive or negative, until the game comes out and we will see which of the legends concerning it ring true.
Well if that is Gameplay then it looks awesome, But why do i feel that this is optimized for Nvidia more than ATI
@Glordit
I'll be testing it with a AMD FX8350 @4.5Ghz and a i7 4770K + i5 4670K with both a R9 290X and a 780Ti.
The thing that is really grinding me is this idiot that keeps on spewing shit, I don't think he even realizes how he is pissing off gamers.
This game has gone from "you'll need a top of the range rig with a minimum i7 and 780 to max it" to "As long as your cpu scores 9000 passmark (i5) and you have a GTX670 you'll be able to run it at ultra"
Then in the same breath he says the game won't even launch unless you have a minimum of 6GB ram..
This game is either made up of piss poor coding or he doesn't know what he is talking about.
Seriously wtf are they doing at Ubisoft? Do they not know when to stop talking...
Last edited by The Joker; 22-05-2014 at 07:30 PM.
Eat - Sleep - Overclock - Repeat
Joker then tell me quick should i worry or not I5 Quad 8gb ram and R9 270X O.C edition will i be able to enjoy this game or not my upgrade is only in Sept or oct
Posting Permissions
