Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: Watch Dogs PS4, Xbox One graphics match PC high settings

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Thread Killer MKII The Joker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    The Hardware Section
    Posts
    10,600

    Default

    lol this guy, he really should learn when to shut the fuck up...All he is doing is pissing gamers off. So what this tells me is they've either gimped the pc version or he is just talking out of his ass, considering he also claims you'll need a minimum of 6GB ram to even run the game on PC...Ubisoft really should staple his mouth shut.
    Eat - Sleep - Overclock - Repeat

  2. #2
    Neo Zeon Glordit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Axis
    Posts
    5,457

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Joker View Post
    lol this guy, he really should learn when to shut the fuck up...All he is doing is pissing gamers off. So what this tells me is they've either gimped the pc version or he is just talking out of his ass, considering he also claims you'll need a minimum of 6GB ram to even run the game on PC...Ubisoft really should staple his mouth shut.
    I am willing to try the PC version on a Pentium G/i3 GTX750ti and 4GB's of RAM.

    The minimum specs need a Q8400

    According to CPU Boss: http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core2-...l-Core-i3-4130 an i3 haswell has the same performance as it.

    http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?....40GHz&id=2015
    http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?....66GHz&id=1041

    Then they go on to state: Graphics: DirectX 11 graphics card with 1 GB Video RAM – Nvidia Geforce GTX 460 or AMD Radeon HD 5770

    Only 1GB of VRAM? Okay... GTX 460/HD5770 they say: http://gpuboss.com/gpus/Radeon-HD-57...eForce-GTX-460 While the two cards are similar they have varying strenths and weaknesses.

    I can see a GTX 750Ti/non-Ti handle the game well enough at 720/900p maybe 1080p at a stretch, still some funky QA and marketing going on here.
    Last edited by Glordit; 22-05-2014 at 07:11 PM.

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Joker View Post
    lol this guy, he really should learn when to shut the fuck up...All he is doing is pissing gamers off. So what this tells me is they've either gimped the pc version or he is just talking out of his ass, considering he also claims you'll need a minimum of 6GB ram to even run the game on PC...Ubisoft really should staple his mouth shut.
    Sigh, it's like your intentionally being difficult about this. PC games 99% of the time go up to ultra, high != ultra. There is also no mention of FPS. So the consoles can do it at 30FPS, but PCs can get above 100FPS. The difference is huge. If it's such a big deal to you please cancel your pre-order.
    When an anti-piracy method is affecting the game for people who legitimately bought it and causing other people not to buy the game, there is obviously something wrong with it!

  4. #4
    Thread Killer MKII The Joker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    The Hardware Section
    Posts
    10,600

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wyzak View Post
    Sigh, it's like your intentionally being difficult about this. PC games 99% of the time go up to ultra, high != ultra. There is also no mention of FPS. So the consoles can do it at 30FPS, but PCs can get above 100FPS. The difference is huge. If it's such a big deal to you please cancel your pre-order.
    Nvm not gonna bother with a response to this.
    Last edited by The Joker; 23-05-2014 at 10:22 AM.
    Eat - Sleep - Overclock - Repeat

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Joker View Post
    No because your being a fanboy, your blind to their mistakes.
    The game hasn't even released yet and your defending them...I don't get it. Are you paid by Ubisoft or something?

    Also there are thousands of people complaining about the same thing, just because you live in your Ubisoft fanboy box doesn't mean we all have too.
    No, firstly graphics isn't everything to me. I've played MUDs for years and they are some of my best gaming memories. Secondly, you sound like a broken tape recorded and don't take anything that the guy says for face value. He says high is comparable to the console, not the best setting is comparable to the best setting. You take no mention of my post about the frame rate. You take no mention of the fact that they've said several times that you can't compare a day screenshot in one area to a nigh screenshot in another area where it's raining. You also can't compare the consoles to PCs directly and let's face facts: for most of the screen shots we have no idea which platform it's running on.

    I'm not a fan boy, but I'm really looking forward to this game which for all intents and purposes looks to be an awesome game. Sure it's graphics might end up being slightly worse than they originally marketed, but it might also not be. I am however 100% sure that that won't be the deciding factor for me whether or not it will be an awesome game.

    I have respect for Ubisoft for deciding to delay the game because they weren't happy with the state it was in, this delay cost them a crap load of money and they took it on the chin.
    I have respect for Ubisoft for realizing that always-online is a failed concept and actually removing it from their games.

    Watch Dogs will be an awesome game irrespective of whether the graphics is holy-sh1t amazing, or just great.
    When an anti-piracy method is affecting the game for people who legitimately bought it and causing other people not to buy the game, there is obviously something wrong with it!

  6. #6
    Snare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Earth Prime
    Posts
    1,760

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wyzak View Post
    No, firstly graphics isn't everything to me. I've played MUDs for years and they are some of my best gaming memories. Secondly, you sound like a broken tape recorded and don't take anything that the guy says for face value. He says high is comparable to the console, not the best setting is comparable to the best setting. You take no mention of my post about the frame rate. You take no mention of the fact that they've said several times that you can't compare a day screenshot in one area to a nigh screenshot in another area where it's raining. You also can't compare the consoles to PCs directly and let's face facts: for most of the screen shots we have no idea which platform it's running on.

    I'm not a fan boy, but I'm really looking forward to this game which for all intents and purposes looks to be an awesome game. Sure it's graphics might end up being slightly worse than they originally marketed, but it might also not be. I am however 100% sure that that won't be the deciding factor for me whether or not it will be an awesome game.

    I have respect for Ubisoft for deciding to delay the game because they weren't happy with the state it was in, this delay cost them a crap load of money and they took it on the chin.
    I have respect for Ubisoft for realizing that always-online is a failed concept and actually removing it from their games.

    Watch Dogs will be an awesome game irrespective of whether the graphics is holy-sh1t amazing, or just great.
    I think the issue that Joker is having is not purely the graphical fidelity of the game; but rather the fact that Ubisoft is sending extremely mixed messages about the graphics. I do agree that if the game is truly amazing then the graphics need not blow me away; however it doesn't inspire confidence in the product that every few weeks they are changing their story. Also a delay in production schedule does not equal to a great game. The game is out on Tuesday so let's reserve judgement ,positive or negative, until the game comes out and we will see which of the legends concerning it ring true.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snare View Post
    I think the issue that Joker is having is not purely the graphical fidelity of the game; but rather the fact that Ubisoft is sending extremely mixed messages about the graphics. I do agree that if the game is truly amazing then the graphics need not blow me away; however it doesn't inspire confidence in the product that every few weeks they are changing their story. Also a delay in production schedule does not equal to a great game. The game is out on Tuesday so let's reserve judgement ,positive or negative, until the game comes out and we will see which of the legends concerning it ring true.
    I can appreciate that, but then he is fully within his rights to cancel his pre-order. Constantly over-analysing every single press release and sounding like a broken tape recorder isn't helping anybody.
    When an anti-piracy method is affecting the game for people who legitimately bought it and causing other people not to buy the game, there is obviously something wrong with it!

Similar Threads

  1. Watch Dogs launch date leaked by Xbox.com
    By James in forum Gaming News Articles
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-03-2014, 09:50 AM
  2. Sleeping Dogs PC boasts graphics tweaks and high-res textures
    By James in forum Gaming News Articles
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-08-2012, 09:42 AM
  3. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 07-06-2012, 09:47 AM
  4. Batman Arkham City Graphics Settings
    By ViperGTI in forum Gaming Discussions
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-12-2011, 08:29 AM
  5. Battlefield 3 PC graphics settings explained
    By qornea in forum Gaming News Articles
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 27-10-2011, 08:34 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •