Watch Dogs PS4, Xbox One graphics match PC high settings

[Wyzak]

lol this guy, he really should learn when to shut the fuck up...All he is doing is pissing gamers off. So what this tells me is they've either gimped the pc version or he is just talking out of his ass, considering he also claims you'll need a minimum of 6GB ram to even run the game on PC...Ubisoft really should staple his mouth shut.

Sigh, it's like your intentionally being difficult about this. PC games 99% of the time go up to ultra, high != ultra. There is also no mention of FPS. So the consoles can do it at 30FPS, but PCs can get above 100FPS. The difference is huge. If it's such a big deal to you please cancel your pre-order.

[The Joker]

Sigh, it's like your intentionally being difficult about this. PC games 99% of the time go up to ultra, high != ultra. There is also no mention of FPS. So the consoles can do it at 30FPS, but PCs can get above 100FPS. The difference is huge. If it's such a big deal to you please cancel your pre-order.

Nvm not gonna bother with a response to this.

[Wyzak]

No because your being a fanboy, your blind to their mistakes.
The game hasn't even released yet and your defending them...I don't get it. Are you paid by Ubisoft or something?

Also there are thousands of people complaining about the same thing, just because you live in your Ubisoft fanboy box doesn't mean we all have too.

No, firstly graphics isn't everything to me. I've played MUDs for years and they are some of my best gaming memories. Secondly, you sound like a broken tape recorded and don't take anything that the guy says for face value. He says high is comparable to the console, not the best setting is comparable to the best setting. You take no mention of my post about the frame rate. You take no mention of the fact that they've said several times that you can't compare a day screenshot in one area to a nigh screenshot in another area where it's raining. You also can't compare the consoles to PCs directly and let's face facts: for most of the screen shots we have no idea which platform it's running on.

I'm not a fan boy, but I'm really looking forward to this game which for all intents and purposes looks to be an awesome game. Sure it's graphics might end up being slightly worse than they originally marketed, but it might also not be. I am however 100% sure that that won't be the deciding factor for me whether or not it will be an awesome game.

I have respect for Ubisoft for deciding to delay the game because they weren't happy with the state it was in, this delay cost them a crap load of money and they took it on the chin.
I have respect for Ubisoft for realizing that always-online is a failed concept and actually removing it from their games.

Watch Dogs will be an awesome game irrespective of whether the graphics is holy-sh1t amazing, or just great.

[Snare]

No, firstly graphics isn't everything to me. I've played MUDs for years and they are some of my best gaming memories. Secondly, you sound like a broken tape recorded and don't take anything that the guy says for face value. He says high is comparable to the console, not the best setting is comparable to the best setting. You take no mention of my post about the frame rate. You take no mention of the fact that they've said several times that you can't compare a day screenshot in one area to a nigh screenshot in another area where it's raining. You also can't compare the consoles to PCs directly and let's face facts: for most of the screen shots we have no idea which platform it's running on.

I'm not a fan boy, but I'm really looking forward to this game which for all intents and purposes looks to be an awesome game. Sure it's graphics might end up being slightly worse than they originally marketed, but it might also not be. I am however 100% sure that that won't be the deciding factor for me whether or not it will be an awesome game.

I have respect for Ubisoft for deciding to delay the game because they weren't happy with the state it was in, this delay cost them a crap load of money and they took it on the chin.
I have respect for Ubisoft for realizing that always-online is a failed concept and actually removing it from their games.

Watch Dogs will be an awesome game irrespective of whether the graphics is holy-sh1t amazing, or just great.

I think the issue that Joker is having is not purely the graphical fidelity of the game; but rather the fact that Ubisoft is sending extremely mixed messages about the graphics. I do agree that if the game is truly amazing then the graphics need not blow me away; however it doesn't inspire confidence in the product that every few weeks they are changing their story. Also a delay in production schedule does not equal to a great game. The game is out on Tuesday so let's reserve judgement ,positive or negative, until the game comes out and we will see which of the legends concerning it ring true.

[Wyzak]

I think the issue that Joker is having is not purely the graphical fidelity of the game; but rather the fact that Ubisoft is sending extremely mixed messages about the graphics. I do agree that if the game is truly amazing then the graphics need not blow me away; however it doesn't inspire confidence in the product that every few weeks they are changing their story. Also a delay in production schedule does not equal to a great game. The game is out on Tuesday so let's reserve judgement ,positive or negative, until the game comes out and we will see which of the legends concerning it ring true.

I can appreciate that, but then he is fully within his rights to cancel his pre-order. Constantly over-analysing every single press release and sounding like a broken tape recorder isn't helping anybody.