Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 36

Thread: ITNT: R1 per GB capped

  1. #11
    Neo Zeon Glordit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Axis
    Posts
    5,457

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HavocXphere View Post
    That I can tell you now already - it won't. R1 is below sustainable levels at the moment...by quite a bit.
    I can understand their business practice completely, 100 people at R1 as opposed to 10 at R10, but at some point their system is going to meet a saturation point and it's going to be detrimental to everyone. Of course unless they can produce an almost infinite amount of bandwidth via IS.

  2. #12
    Cronus086's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    1,070

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Glordit View Post
    I can understand their business practice completely, 100 people at R1 as opposed to 10 at R10, but at some point their system is going to meet a saturation point and it's going to be detrimental to everyone. Of course unless they can produce an almost infinite amount of bandwidth via IS.
    Have to agree, everything seems fantastic until more and more people start joining. At some point their going to reach a bottleneck and their quality is going to go down. I'll rather wait until i can be 100% sure i won't get shafted in the end.

  3. #13
    brendanvb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    George, South Africa
    Posts
    2,554

    Default

    Yeah I'm also going to see how things go over the months. It just seems to good to be true, but I really hope they can sustain it. The market definitely needs some strong competition. Now if only someone could find a way to cut Telkom out of the picture...

  4. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Glordit View Post
    I can understand their business practice completely, 100 people at R1 as opposed to 10 at R10
    Doesn't work like that - mainly because 100 people use 10x more capacity than 10 people, but as per your example don't bring in 10x as much cash. The constraint is cash flow, not a bandwidth saturation point (you can always pick up the phone and order more intertubes...if you have cash).

    But yes your conclusion is essentially correct - something has got to give. My crystal ball says it'll hold for about 2 months though before price/performance shifts dramatically.
    #hashtag #anotherhashtag #bonushashtag

  5. #15
    B1nary's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    1,465

    Default

    If they don't really sell any uncapped accounts maybe it will be sustainable, the bandwidth used by uncapped users probably outways capped by far.

  6. #16

    Default

    They do sell uncappeds...the pricing is a bit more normal though
    #hashtag #anotherhashtag #bonushashtag

  7. #17
    Neo Zeon Glordit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Axis
    Posts
    5,457

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HavocXphere View Post
    Doesn't work like that - mainly because 100 people use 10x more capacity than 10 people, but as per your example don't bring in 10x as much cash. The constraint is cash flow, not a bandwidth saturation point (you can always pick up the phone and order more intertubes...if you have cash).

    But yes your conclusion is essentially correct - something has got to give. My crystal ball says it'll hold for about 2 months though before price/performance shifts dramatically.
    I apologise, for not giving more clarity. the Rand per customer value was supposed to be a crude example of more people paying less can equate to more profits than a smaller amount paying more. It had nothing to do with the network, which would obviously strain more under more people.

  8. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Glordit View Post
    I apologise, for not giving more clarity. the Rand per customer value was supposed to be a crude example of more people paying less can equate to more profits than a smaller amount paying more. It had nothing to do with the network, which would obviously strain more under more people.
    All good...this stuff gets evil complicated.

    Anyway...for reference...I rate the current break even for heavily contended data is somewhere round the 1.5 mark.
    #hashtag #anotherhashtag #bonushashtag

  9. #19

    Default

    Hang on... something weird is going on. Can anyone else still top up at R1 per GB?

    Damn. The MyBB thread is going crazy. I really hope ITNT has just had a system glitch because if the promo has ended then this is officially the weirdest scam ever.

    http://mybroadband.co.za/vb/showthre...eedback/page13

    Oh well. Still got 25GB of good data I feel bad for posting this now...
    Last edited by Ser_Bunnylot; 23-09-2014 at 08:41 AM.

  10. #20
    Whale Masseur AlienTaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Pretoria
    Posts
    5,030

    Default

    i jsut need to know it's only the once off's that are rand per gig right because as soon as you register i see there is a montly option of R60 for 10Gb i'm confused now

Similar Threads

  1. Capped vs Uncapped?
    By bradbear117 in forum Broadband Internet and Gaming
    Replies: 64
    Last Post: 11-02-2014, 10:06 PM
  2. Capped ADSL price cuts from Web Africa
    By James in forum Gaming News Articles
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-02-2014, 09:06 AM
  3. Need for Speed Rivals capped at 30FPS on PC?
    By James in forum Gaming News Articles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 19-11-2013, 12:23 AM
  4. What is better for gaming - capped or uncapped?
    By Jeremy in forum Gaming News Articles
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 15-08-2012, 10:26 PM
  5. Battlefield 3 Team Deathmatch capped at 24 players
    By CrouxL in forum Gaming News Articles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 25-08-2011, 09:00 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •