My dad is looking at getting a new TV. he saw a 50" UHD for about 13k and a 55" LED for around 12k (from Makro). I don't think there is any benefit to getting the UHD and i think he should rather get the 55" LED.
what do you guys reckon ?
My dad is looking at getting a new TV. he saw a 50" UHD for about 13k and a 55" LED for around 12k (from Makro). I don't think there is any benefit to getting the UHD and i think he should rather get the 55" LED.
what do you guys reckon ?
Just make sure you shower with the correct one*.
*That link is quite possibly NSFW.
--~<0>~-- {type}DEV --~<0>~--
For 1k difference I'd go with the UHD. Sure, there isn't much UHD content yet, but in many years from now there definitely will be and then at least he wouldn't need to upgrade again (that's assuming he cares at all about quality).
UHD is the future, its not just a gimmick like 3D and curved tv's.
So if your dad buys a UHD Tv now he won't have to "upgrade" in the near future.
Eat - Sleep - Overclock - Repeat
You mention a "proper UHD" in 5 years time, yet there are already proper UHD tv's and monitors available.
I got to play with the new LG 31MU97 (True cinema HD 4096x2160) and it was spectacular. I've also done a few UHD tv installs and they were all amazing.
And why mention G-Sync? This is a thread about Tv's not over priced pc monitors.
Eat - Sleep - Overclock - Repeat