Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: [Xbox 360] Bayonetta (First Impressions)

  1. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Planet larch
    Posts
    427

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tehNihilist View Post
    Since you started posting on this site I got the strong feeling that most of your posts would be of a contradictory nature, just for its sake.
    No offense but if I wanted a psychological evaluation of my posting habits I would have asked. And I am pretty sure I did not ask.

    Quote Originally Posted by tehNihilist View Post
    Unless those opinions fell into your skew on things. And well it seems my assumptions are correct.
    Life lesson number 1 assumptions are the mother of all fusckups.

    Quote Originally Posted by tehNihilist View Post
    Simple fact is I have played it on PS3 and it is not the trash-heap that people like to make it out to be.
    No one said it was a trash heap I stated it plays better on the Xbox 360 because of the frame rate. Low frame rate = slow gameplay which does not go well with a game like Bayonetta.

    Quote Originally Posted by tehNihilist View Post
    Again it comes down to this stupid console elitism. YES the Xbox version IS superior, YES it is still good on PS3 if you have no other choice.
    Making assumption again?

    Quote Originally Posted by larch View Post
    Blame the developers its usually not the hardware.
    http://mygaming.co.za/forum/showpost...6&postcount=15

    Open mouth insert foot. And if you bothered reading the link to the website:

    Conclusion: The winner of this game seems more than obvious. But then there wasn’t a surprise to this either. This is one of first games to be publicly criticized for its poor port while still in its demo. Sega publicly admitted that they passed the port off to another company. Sega SHOULD have stepped up and fixed the issues to make sure the port was identical. Instead they proved that not only were they not interested in spending extra money to ensure quality, but also that they’re quite fine with ripping off the public by charging the same amount for an inferior copy. But why lay blame solely to Sega. They published the poor port, but Sony should have stepped in for quality control. You can only blame the publishers for so long before you start wondering why a company would allow for a poor port to be on their console. It’s a simple concept know as quality control. In the end, Bayonetta wins on the Xbox 360 for this Head2Head more for Sega and Sony’s lack of quality control.
    Last edited by larch; 29-01-2010 at 01:23 AM.

  2. #12
    tehNihilist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    The Unfocused
    Posts
    1,293

    Default

    And here we go...

    Honestly your internet angst puts me to sleep. Good luck to you all who will have to endure this endlessly! Really, I mean it!

    /ignore
    Last edited by tehNihilist; 29-01-2010 at 01:24 AM.

  3. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Planet larch
    Posts
    427

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tehNihilist View Post
    And here we go...

    Honestly your internet angst puts me to sleep. Good luck to you all who will have to endure this endlessly! Really, I mean it!

    /ignore
    No offense to you but you were the one jumping on your "PS3 defense force horsey" then proceeded assume that I was saying that the PS3 was inferior to the Xbox 360 and that this was some console elitist thing. You put your own foot in your mouth without any help from me.
    Last edited by larch; 29-01-2010 at 01:44 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •