For me the difference is that I absolutely refuse to use any Apple products, I'm a bit more forgiving when it comes to EA because of Need for Speed, Dead Space & Mass Effect primarily.
For me the difference is that I absolutely refuse to use any Apple products, I'm a bit more forgiving when it comes to EA because of Need for Speed, Dead Space & Mass Effect primarily.
I'm surprised there's no mention there of EA hiring people to "protest" against their own Dante's Inferno release, using it to create hype for the game...
I'm with Lydon here, if EA only paid half the ammount of attention to their products as to what Apple does I would actually buy their games. They the jerk without the lure.Originally Posted by PsychoFish
I would give what for a remastered Syndicate or even Wing Commander, or even a proper C&C game.... but sadly we know that will never happen.
Check out MyGaming Steam giveaways and
Feel like I posted this before, but its EA, and if only THEY would watch it....
Some people are starting to wake up and not just buy the game because its battlefield.
Evil meet my Sword. Sword, meet Evil!
The best way to beat EA is to support the devs that simply makes better games outside of EA , case in point Cities:Skylines , that is what SimCity 4 should've have been, and i think as long as Cities does well, EA will be forced to release games that are actually good without corporate BS .
EA will never again be able to release a SimCity game with all the BS attached to it while Cities:Skylines are out there and doing well.
What i find more interesting about those stats are how many players are playing the new BF on console (on the PS4 specifically) and a serious lack of PC players , in contrast BF4 is clearly big on PC . Methinks PCs are not handling the game that well, or PC gamers are playing GTAV now
Some people are starting to wake up and not just buy the game because its battlefield.
Last edited by diabolus; 25-04-2015 at 09:26 AM.
Has anyone seen this image?
T A N S T A A F L
Posting Permissions
