Please quote the offending sentence(s).
You're simply confusing the issue here. NATAL USES CAMERAS AND OTHER STUFF TO SIMULATE MOTION CONTROL.NATAL does not actually a camera in the strictest sense:
HARDWARE MOTION CONTROL.
MOTION CONTROL.
Again, it's not something new. It's certainly taking the technology further than before, but hardware motion control is not something revolutionary in and of itself. I don't see anything in this article that moves outside this particular argument.
And neither I nor the writer of this article are saying it is. But it is related, comparable technology regardless.So its a combination of a Sensor/Camera/Depth sensor and microphone, not just a simple camera like the eyetoy.
Once again, it's very clearly an opinion piece. Opinion pieces are largely subjective. That's kind of the whole point. Accusing this article of slander is absurd, and honestly, it's the kind of thing a fanboy does.A good writer researches and studies the topic thoroughly before forming a opinion, and usually he tries to be unbiased as possible. If a article is not objective and only service to slander something then its not writing anymore but crap.




