Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 41

Thread: Dont buy 1st batch of Nvidia's new card!!!

  1. #21
    Tyger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
    Posts
    111

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Necuno View Post
    zmg.

    /gives out nvidia beating sticks
    ATI branded sticks

  2. #22

    Default

    I must admit that I am not very impressed with the benchmarks I have see regarding Nvidia's Series 4 chipset.

  3. #23
    Overkill Specialist Tank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Amanzimtoti, South Africa
    Posts
    3,886

    Default

    as time goes the scores will look better. as has been said elsewhere but the temps and power usage are the main issues for me.

    Play games, not platforms

  4. #24

    Default

    GTX 480 Hot and slow,but PhysicX
    HD5870 Quick

  5. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tank View Post
    as time goes the scores will look better. as has been said elsewhere but the temps and power usage are the main issues for me.
    I have to agree tank,anything that runs that hot should require the fire services on speed dial :P.

  6. #26
    ZAP_Tech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Cape Town, South Africa
    Posts
    1,456

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mradsl View Post
    GTX 480 Hot and slow,but PhysicX
    HD5870 Quick
    I had a 295 and even that thing ran hot, not that it didnt perform on its good days.

    FX-8350 | 16GB DDR3-1866 RAM | Corsair H80i | 24TB

  7. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mradsl View Post
    ...PhysicX
    ...
    How important is this PhysicX? From what I can gather, only a few titles support this, or am I missing something?

  8. #28
    tpex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    The 031
    Posts
    4,438

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RaFi View Post
    How important is this PhysicX? From what I can gather, only a few titles support this, or am I missing something?
    Well Batman AA, had some cool physicX effects I gather

  9. #29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RaFi View Post
    How important is this PhysicX? From what I can gather, only a few titles support this, or am I missing something?
    Like any new technology, you won't know what you're missing until you've experienced it. IMHO PhysX is one of the best new technologies on the market and it's a shame that so few titles support it properly. In games that do however support it, like Batman AA, it's absolutely stunning to behold.

    I think the one thing that's holding this technology back is because it's owned by a single graphics card maker, Nvidia. If it were a bit more open sourced so that ATI owners could enjoy this as well I think developers wouldn't hesitate for a second to implement it in their games.

    Remember, developers will never incorporate a technology that could possible split their demographic, where one half enjoys it a lot, and the other half simply wont buy it. It hurts the developers wallets. Games that DO split their demographics are all aligned with a single graphics manufactures anyways, such as "The Way It's Meant To Be Played" campaign run by Nvidia. Developers on that side of the fence get paid by Nvidia to make up for the lost ATI customers which they're not reaching. Well, that's how I think it works anyways.
    My ignore list: growing too fast to keep updating.

  10. #30
    tpex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    The 031
    Posts
    4,438

    Default

    Fuck! I hate those Nvidia ads in games! how am I suppost to play games on such unreliable cards?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •