Quote Originally Posted by Flex View Post
Very True. But for example. Should companies that manufacture money be held liable for gambling lawsuits? Because they are creating the thing on which gambling is based
Money in your example is the instrument of gambling, not the system. I can gamble on anything of value, does not mean that money making is at fault for gambling. But, creating the process and systems that fosters gambling, like Steam creating an environment where gambling can occur, that is why I'm saying they are wrong. Your example isn't accurate to what Steam has created. The fact that you can link Steam accounts to other sites, these sites get access to information about tangible valuable items, creates an environment where people can gamble on it. Thus Steam is indirectly liable.