I still believe something a professor once told me at Tuks when i thought my assignment was so perfect it deserved 100%.
I was quite angry at my 99% mark for some stupid reason but he then said no one is perfect on this planet and nothing is perfect, as soon as you realise this you will always strive to do better and better and better.
As soon as i see a reviewer gives 100% for a game i dont even bother reading. There isnt a single game in history that deserves 100%.
If you want to be very realistic most game will struggle to be in the 90's if you use a broader rating system.
- Controls
- Longevity
- Graphics
- Feel
- Story(if applicable)
- SP
- MP
- DLC
- Community(how easy is it to communicate with others that has this game)
And im sure there are many more things to look at but my point being is how can you give an objective review without looking at the whole picture.
