Neah it was just a plain failure..im sorry but after giving us Cod4 Modern warfare they should have known no one would ever wanna play anoher world war 2 based game..the weapons suck ass...the story has been told over and over and over again!!! Modern Warfare2 FTW!!!!Originally Posted by Peon
so hows the co-op on this?
the guy at btgames reckons army of 2 co-op beats this hands down??
could it be? i prefer the whole ww2 theme personally..
Well I guess its a case of different strokes for different folks.. I love cod 5, cod 4 had a good sp campaign, its better than 5's I won't argue with that, but wtih cod 5 you get co-op mode as well, and I just love the ww2 setting. cod 4 mp became boring after a while, especially with all the noob voting on the servers..
COD 5 FTW !!!!
Single player is ok and multi player just lacks something, much prefer COD4 multi player.
this game was made for xbox dunno why they made it to pc....
I must say I haven't found the weapons in COD 5 to perform any less well than those in COD 4... isn't it just because anything a little more modern has greater appeal?
Played COD5 and reverted back to COD4... COD4 is much more fun to me... It also seems the majority at lans prefer COD4.
A little more modern
No mate there is a huge gigantic diffirence between a world war 2 pistol and a desert eagle. Once you've played cod4 you can't ever say that cod5 is better...cause it just isn't!!
Eat - Sleep - Overclock - Repeat
+1 Modern Warfare is a helluva lot better than World @ WarA little more modern
No mate there is a huge gigantic diffirence between a world war 2 pistol and a desert eagle. Once you've played cod4 you can't ever say that cod5 is better...cause it just isn't!!
I enjoy CDO5 multi more.
Posting Permissions
