Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Assassin's Creed: Where should the next game be set?

  1. #1
    MyGaming Alumnus James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    MyGaming Hive
    Posts
    12,047

    Default Assassin's Creed: Where should the next game be set?

    Assassin's Creed: Where should the next game be set?

    Where does the Assassin's Creed franchise go to next?

  2. #2

    Default

    It feels like it should be set in modern times with desmond, possibly with different overlapping times occasionally popping up due to the "leak" effect the animus has on it's user. Sort of blended reality.

    Personally I'm hoping for Boston/Phillidelphia etc. set during the American Revolution. I struggle to see Assassin's Creed working in a setting with modern firearms while keeping its feel.

  3. #3
    The Legendary Troll Hunter OmegaFenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Not here....
    Posts
    34,144

    Default

    I also see a modern times setting as the next logical step. But like Wolfskunk said it wouldn't be able to keep the same feel if it did. It would turn into a Pure stealth game where being spotted would equal death. Then again mirrors edge has a similar approach so I dunno, anything is possible I guess.
    "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"


  4. #4
    Thread Killer Murph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    20,136

    Default

    A Jack the Ripper setting was the first thing I thought of after finishing AC2, although the Hungarian/Bathory setting would be totally awesome.
    My second idea would be set against the backdrop of WWI.

    I still don't agree with a modern setting - wouldn't it be similar to something like Splinter Cell?

  5. #5
    The Legendary Troll Hunter OmegaFenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Not here....
    Posts
    34,144

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Murph View Post
    A Jack the Ripper setting was the first thing I thought of after finishing AC2, although the Hungarian/Bathory setting would be totally awesome.
    My second idea would be set against the backdrop of WWI.

    I still don't agree with a modern setting - wouldn't it be similar to something like Splinter Cell?
    Think about most decent franchises; Most go belly up the longer they are stretched out, 3 seems to be the magic number, sometimes 4. I mean genius film master Christopher Nolan is only making 3 films in his rebooted Batman series. Bungie made 4 Halo games before moving on.

    If Ubisoft had any sense they wouldn't draw the series in its current narrative arch. Eventually people are going to say, "how many ancestors from different nationalities can Desmond really have?" I say bring Desmond's tale to an end by finding the apple or whatever and then start with a new character and his ancestors. However since this is a money making industry i have little doubt they will drag it out as long as possible. Brotherhood is epic but that only means there is such a high risk of the next one failing to live up.
    "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"


  6. #6
    Thread Killer Murph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    20,136

    Default

    I don't think they should go further than a third game (I mean AC3 not 2.5) anyway. If they want to flesh out another character or something (maybe you play as the ancestor of one of your trainee assassins) they would seriously run the risk of stretching it.

    If they are going to end it on a third game, keep it in the realms of where it is now, going modern would be one hell of a jump. I understand your reasoning about multiple ancestors being a bit awkward, but if you can suspend your disbelief they can go pretty much anywhere.

  7. #7
    The Legendary Troll Hunter OmegaFenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Not here....
    Posts
    34,144

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Murph View Post
    I don't think they should go further than a third game (I mean AC3 not 2.5) anyway. If they want to flesh out another character or something (maybe you play as the ancestor of one of your trainee assassins) they would seriously run the risk of stretching it.

    If they are going to end it on a third game, keep it in the realms of where it is now, going modern would be one hell of a jump. I understand your reasoning about multiple ancestors being a bit awkward, but if you can suspend your disbelief they can go pretty much anywhere.
    Since the lore of AC is about Desmond being able to access the memories of his ancestors. So jumping to another decendant of someone else, not Ezio, would be a huge stretch. Also from a narrative point of view look at how much time they had spend developing Ezio as a character, 2 whole games, thats alot of time, I mean think about it most games spend 1 title building up a character, very few spend 2 or more. Also Ezio is significantly older now and (i have not finished AC:BH) close to completing his own personal quest, to take down the Borgia.

    If nothing else, I would say the next one would have to be divided equally between ancestor and Desmond. Desmond for the pure stealth sections and which ever ancestor they will dream up next to handle the more actiony sequences.

    Just my thoughts.
    "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"


  8. #8
    Thread Killer Murph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    20,136

    Default

    The whole thing with jumping between modern and past, to me at least, was that it was almost intrusive and broke the immersion of this giant ancient world they'd created. With the modern moments, I was like 'I've seen this game already'.
    In AC1 it was actually irritating, with AC2 less so and I'll admit that Brotherhood did it the best. I particularly liked the way that Monterigionni (sp!?!) was presented in modern times, with the street lights and cars - that was a nice touch.

  9. #9
    The Legendary Troll Hunter OmegaFenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Not here....
    Posts
    34,144

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Murph View Post
    The whole thing with jumping between modern and past, to me at least, was that it was almost intrusive and broke the immersion of this giant ancient world they'd created. With the modern moments, I was like 'I've seen this game already'.
    In AC1 it was actually irritating, with AC2 less so and I'll admit that Brotherhood did it the best. I particularly liked the way that Monterigionni (sp!?!) was presented in modern times, with the street lights and cars - that was a nice touch.
    I agree that was brilliant.

    I guess we will just have to wait and see what Ubisoft does.
    "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"


  10. #10

    Default

    I for one hope that it is all modern day!! I prefer Desmond's story to the others.
    "All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, to make it possible."

    - T.E. Lawrence

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •