So why exactly do we have on-die gpu again?

You can play BF3 on mediumish settings at 1366x720 and get 40fps (IIRC) without having the need to buy a graphic cards.

Intel is pushing to get better on die graphics than ever before.
 
You can play BF3 on mediumish settings at 1366x720 and get 40fps (IIRC) without having the need to buy a graphic cards.

Intel is pushing to get better on die graphics than ever before.

Only problem is AMD completely thrashes them with on board gpu.
Also intel's venture into better on board graphics is causing issues with their cpu temps and they are still miles away from being on par with AMD.
 
okeee. I thought whole idea were co-processing between the gpu and cpu. If that made sense...
 
Last edited:
You can play BF3 on mediumish settings at 1366x720 and get 40fps (IIRC) without having the need to buy a graphic cards.

Intel is pushing to get better on die graphics than ever before.

Are you serious? I've been out of the pc gaming side for a while, but I don't expect my ATI 6670 to get close to that performance.
 
Only problem is AMD completely thrashes them with on board gpu.
Also intel's venture into better on board graphics is causing issues with their cpu temps and they are still miles away from being on par with AMD.

i remember when the GFX in my my athlon II lan pc failed I had to use the onboard (off die intergrated) HD3200 graphics and it was able to game 90% of games at 1024 res decently. the on die ones are atleast 2x - 3x faster

also these new on die gpu's works great in laptops as it eliminates the need for a discrete gpu thus less heat + more battery life
 
Last edited:
i remember when the GFX in my my athlon II lan pc failed I had to use the onboard (off die intergrated) HD3200 graphics and it was able to game 90% of games at 1024 res decently. the on die ones are atleast 2x - 3x faster

also these new on die gpu's works great in laptops as it eliminates the need for a discrete gpu thus less heat + more battery life
 
Back
Top