AMD/ATI is the cheap and cheerful approach. hence why their tech goes into cheaper gaming PC’s and also all the consoles. As for GPU’s they wait out each other then release a slightly faster version to boast theirs is the most powerful. Nvidia cards have better features though.
Intel and Nvidia are more expensive hardware resulting in better performance and quality. Intel utterly wipes the floor with AMD who still cling onto old architecture and seem to be focusing on the console and tablet market which requires cheap and cheerful hardware.
As for COD or BF4 – it’s a bit like people who side with one console or another. At the end of the day they both serve the same purpose. Over the top, arcadey FPS nonsense.
MyGaming proudly displays the “FAIR” stamp of the Press Council of South Africa, indicating our commitment to adhere to the Code of Ethics for Print and online media which prescribes that our reportage is truthful, accurate and fair. Should you wish to lodge a complaint about our news coverage, please lodge a complaint on the Press Council’s website, www.presscouncil.org.za or email the complaint to [email protected] Contact the Press Council on 011 4843612.
Loading ...
AMD/ATI is the cheap and cheerful approach. hence why their tech goes into cheaper gaming PC’s and also all the consoles. As for GPU’s they wait out each other then release a slightly faster version to boast theirs is the most powerful. Nvidia cards have better features though.
Intel and Nvidia are more expensive hardware resulting in better performance and quality. Intel utterly wipes the floor with AMD who still cling onto old architecture and seem to be focusing on the console and tablet market which requires cheap and cheerful hardware.
As for COD or BF4 – it’s a bit like people who side with one console or another. At the end of the day they both serve the same purpose. Over the top, arcadey FPS nonsense.