Game publishers that don’t support YouTube monetisation

11 December 2013

Several prominent YouTubers have been affected by a new policy (dubbed Content ID System) that aims to decrease the amount of advertising revenue that videos are earning when they feature content that belongs to an original copyright holder.

The policy is beginning to negatively affect the “Let’s Play” gaming community on the video service – prominent personalities who provide lengthy play sessions of popular games, often with quirky, humorous, and informative commentary.

Read more about the situation as it developed here: YouTube policy destroying the “Let’s Play” community?

The table below contains the current policies announced by the game developers who will be making use of the Content ID System and it doesn’t bode well for smaller channels who are not affiliates or managed under a bigger brand.

The information for the game publishers below was collected by Alloyseven.

 Game Developer/Publisher
Video uploads allowed
Video monetisation allowed
Activision  No  No
Bethesda Softworks  No  No
Bungie  No  No
Capcom  Yes  No
GungHo Online  Yes  No
Microsoft Studios  Yes  No
Natsume  Yes  No
Naughty Dog  Yes  No
Nintendo  Yes  No
NIS America  Yes  No
Rockstar  Yes  No
Take-Two Interactive  Yes  No
Sega  No  No
SNK  No  No
Square Enix  No  No
TecmoKoei  Yes  No
Telltale Games  Yes  No

Across the Internet, videos are popping up from YouTubers to help others avoid copyright claims on their videos. A list of tips is being passed around online and covers the things that would most likely have your advertising income removed:

  • Don’t include in-game music that is copyright-protected.
  • Don’t include footage of game trailers for 10 consecutive seconds or more.
  • Don’t include footage of games for 10 consecutive seconds or more.
  • Don’t mention the names of game publishers, the game’s title, or the game’s developers too often.
  • Make more videos about indie games instead.

It remains to be seen if smaller independent developers and other publishers will allow the monetisation of videos that feature gameplay of their products. It makes sense that smaller studios that do not have big advertising budgets would see the benefits of having people on YouTube play their games.

But for the bigger publishers who would prefer to earn money on their intellectual property in any way possible? They’re going to block those YouTubers who play their games. These publishers will therefore no longer receive free advertising on a platform that spreads information faster than word of mouth.

Source: AlloSeven gaming

More Gaming news:

PS4 to lead this console generation: report

YouTube policy destroying the “Let’s Play” community?

Do Gaming League 2014 registrations open

GTA 5: new single- and multi-player content planned

You have read 1 out of 5 free articles. Log in or register for unlimited access.
  1. Sou1Co11ector
    12.12.2013 at 06:56

    WOuld’ve expected to see Craptivision there and those money-grubbing-shark-lawyer company called Bethesda…

Read now

The best gaming website in South Africa
MyGaming proudly displays the “FAIR” stamp of the Press Council of South Africa, indicating our commitment to adhere to the Code of Ethics for Print and online media which prescribes that our reportage is truthful, accurate and fair. Should you wish to lodge a complaint about our news coverage, please lodge a complaint on the Press Council’s website, www.presscouncil.org.za or email the complaint to [email protected] Contact the Press Council on 011 4843612.