Don't worry, I don't take offense that easily. I get your point of Nvidia fans buying the expensive cards and so perhaps justifying Nvidia pricing their cards as such. However, people won't pay a lot of money for something that doesn't work or performs poorly. I'm not convinced they are paying much more for slower performing cards. They might pay more for a Nvidia card that is a bit slower than the competing AMD card, but it isn't just about performance.
It is build quality, power usage, temperature, noise, drivers, etc. All these things Nvidia are currently doing better than AMD, and people are clearly willing to pay more for these things.
I agree that AMD has some stellar cards with the R9 series, especially the midrange ones, but on the high end they are not comparing well with Nvidia.
The recent price drops from AMD might help them with market share, but I am not sure it is helping them with their bottom line. Cutting prices on cards reduces profits, something AMD sorely needs. They had to cut the pricing to compete with Nvidia.
You have your die hard fans that will always buy Nvidia no matter what, but I think this is small market segment. Most people want the best bang for their buck, be it Nvidia or AMD that gives it to them. Right now (and for the past few years) it has been Nvidia. If AMD bring out great new cards, people will convert, however market share won't change overnight in AMD's favour, it will take time. The current gap in market share also didn't happen overnight, it started quite a few years ago.