Blazzok
New member
Hi.
Thank you for your advice thus far.
[MENTION=6280]Blazzok[/MENTION]
I have a 1920x1080 monitor, and intend to keep it until it stops working, so 1080p is where it's at. I'm not too cut up about the idea of it not being practical to run recent details using the highest available graphics settings. While I may sometimes install high resolution texture packs, I don't usually use antialiasing: jaggies or seeing games rendered down to the most minute detail don't faze me when I have been sucked into the world of an RPG-and disabling it leads to smoother gameplay. When I do crank up visual fidelity is when I think an older game could benefit from it, and I have less reason to worry about performance hits.
I don't envisage getting a GTX 970 regardless of how good it may be. While I may allow myself R200-R300 latitude on items, I shall not be stretching my budget to Mr Fantastic-like proportions. I am aiming for a total spend of between R5000 and R6000, so buying a 970 will leave me little room for anything else.
I am avoiding the 280X/380 because [if I understand what I have read correctly] it uses much more power than the GTX 960. If I am wrong about this, it would not be the first time.
I'm not overly concerned about DirectX 12 yet: perhaps when the majority of games use it I shall be.
The 280X uses 210 - 230W during gaming, the GTX 960 uses 80 - 110W during gaming. So yeah, basically double the power. The 280X is a more powerful card though. If you can afford a GTX970, that would be even better and still uses less power than the 280X. The 970 uses about 170-190W.