Dark Bane it will crush 1080 and 1070 there are two polaris GPUs from 200 dollars to 300 dollars the cheapest polaris 10 packs 2304 sp 8gb 150w max so already on spec alone 1070 is dead and with no oc headroom after the 2ghz boost clock is kinda meh. then we have the yet to be announced full fat polaris which on so alone matches the 1080 cuda cores. add in the new arch improvements in the front end(DX 11, Tessellation,Compression, Geometry Processing) etc it will be epic.
Dark Bane it will crush 1080 and 1070 there are two polaris GPUs from 200 dollars to 300 dollars the cheapest polaris 10 packs 2304 sp 8gb 150w max so already on spec alone 1070 is dead and with no oc headroom after the 2ghz boost clock is kinda meh. then we have the yet to be announced full fat polaris which on so alone matches the 1080 cuda cores. add in the new arch improvements in the front end(DX 11, Tessellation,Compression, Geometry Processing) etc it will be epic.
Dark Bane it will crush 1080 and 1070 there are two polaris GPUs from 200 dollars to 300 dollars the cheapest polaris 10 packs 2304 sp 8gb 150w max so already on spec alone 1070 is dead and with no oc headroom after the 2ghz boost clock is kinda meh. then we have the yet to be announced full fat polaris which on so alone matches the 1080 cuda cores. add in the new arch improvements in the front end(DX 11, Tessellation,Compression, Geometry Processing) etc it will be epic.
No just no.
The RX480 is aimed at a completely different market segment.
We also have absolutely no idea how it'll perform as there are no actual game or synthetic benchmarks available except for the little bit we saw at the event.
There will definitely be another Polaris card, which will most likely slip into the $300 range. As far as performance goes..I think AMD would like to target the 1070...Not sure if they can though.
The cards that tackle the 1080 and hopefully 1080Ti are code named Vega. these cards won't be available till at least October of this year. Very little info about Vega is known.
Also Vega won't be cheap. We know it'll be using HBM2 stacked memory which is fairly expensive vs GDDR5/X, we also know it'll be the big die card, if I had to guess I would say anything between $700-$1000 for the full fat Vega card.
No just no.
The RX480 is aimed at a completely different market segment.
We also have absolutely no idea how it'll perform as there are no actual game or synthetic benchmarks available except for the little bit we saw at the event.
There will definitely be another Polaris card, which will most likely slip into the $300 range. As far as performance goes..I think AMD would like to target the 1070...Not sure if they can though.
The cards that tackle the 1080 and hopefully 1080Ti are code named Vega. these cards won't be available till at least October of this year. Very little info about Vega is known.
Also Vega won't be cheap. We know it'll be using HBM2 stacked memory which is fairly expensive vs GDDR5/X, we also know it'll be the big die card, if I had to guess I would say anything between $700-$1000 for the full fat Vega card.
From what I understand so far, I think the GTX 1070 has been or will be beaten by the RX 480 as it has been rumoured to have performance figures similar to the GTX 980. There seems to be some that think it'll even compete closely with the GTX 1080. Which may mean that the 490 may very well be one monstrous card. As for the Vega cards not being cheap, I really hope that's not the case.
Sounds like you're gravitating all the more towards the green team these days.![]()
From what I understand so far, I think the GTX 1070 has been or will be beaten by the RX 480 as it has been rumoured to have performance figures similar to the GTX 980. There seems to be some that think it'll even compete closely with the GTX 1080. Which may mean that the 490 may very well be one monstrous card. As for the Vega cards not being cheap, I really hope that's not the case.

It is strongly advised to take anything coming from videocardz.com (and 3DMark, for that matter) with more than a grain of salt, but this graph does seem plausible, considering what we know atm.
http://videocardz.com/60253/amd-radeon-r9-480-3dmark11-benchmarks
View attachment 21155
67DF:C7 CF = RX 480 Crossfire
67DF:C7 = Single RX 480
67DF:C4 = Single RX 470 (or R 480?)
AMD themselves have said the RX480 targets the R9 390/GTX970 and could possibly take on the GTX980 at a much much lower price point while using far less power. Their plan is to gain market share. People need to realize that the ultra high end enthusiast market makes up less than 1 percent of gamers.
It is strongly advised to take anything coming from videocardz.com (and 3DMark, for that matter) with more than a grain of salt, but this graph does seem plausible, considering what we know atm.
http://videocardz.com/60253/amd-radeon-r9-480-3dmark11-benchmarks
View attachment 21155
67DF:C7 CF = RX 480 Crossfire
67DF:C7 = Single RX 480
67DF:C4 = Single RX 470 (or R 480?)
The X in the RX series is 10, since it would be lame to call everything a R10 480, R being Radeon, X being 10 and 4xx being the series of card, 460/470/480 and possibly a 580 series.
I am genuinely excited for the new AMD Cards, the last one I had was ATI 9600XT
The X in the RX series is 10, since it would be lame to call everything a R10 480, R being Radeon, X being 10 and 4xx being the series of card, 460/470/480 and possibly a 580 series.
I am genuinely excited for the new AMD Cards, the last one I had was ATI 9600XT
If this is correct then the 480 competes quite favourably with the GTX 980. & since this is the reference card, I'm hoping we'll have non-reference cards that can reach or surpass the GTX 980Ti. But seeing this, I wonder if AMD will have anything to go against a 1080Ti, which I suspect we'll be seeing sooner or later.
LOL xD You clown. I'm just trying to stop the spread of misinformation.
AMD themselves have said the RX480 targets the R9 390/GTX970 and could possibly take on the GTX980 at a much much lower price point while using far less power. Their plan is to gain market share. People need to realize that the ultra high end enthusiast market makes up less than 1 percent of gamers.