This guy thinks we can build a working Starship

shadowfox

Anime Junkie
This is from the original article:

In Star Trek lore, the first Starship Enterprise will be built by the year 2245. But today, an engineer has proposed — and outlined in meticulous detail – building a full-sized, ion-powered version of the Enterprise complete with 1G of gravity on board, and says it could be done with current technology, within 20 years. “We have the technological reach to build the first generation of the spaceship known as the USS Enterprise – so let’s do it,” writes the curator of the Build The Enterprise website, who goes by the name of BTE Dan.

You can read it here but if you want to you can go and look at his actual site at http://www.buildtheenterprise.org/

[You might have some trouble accessing - all the extra attention is making his server fall over. Just wait and try again later :p]

So, if this actually works ... in about 30 years we could be experiencing the following:

Captain: Helm, set a course for Jupiter, Warp Factor 1

Helm: We can't do warp, Captain, but if you want we can use the Ion Drives to accelerate really, really slowly.

Captain: Very well ....

QjUO9.jpg
 
In Star Trek lore we still have 51 years to go before the first warp drive tests in the Phoenix, but if we could do it sooner ;-)
 
IMO we spend entirely too much money on trivial crap like famine and stuff. We should just funnel all that $$$ into building viable space craft so we can start colonising other worlds.

Too bad he didn't read this first:

The spaceship is dead

One of the more indelible aspects of the Star Trek franchise is the use of spaceships. They are the futuristic analog to naval ships, both in terms of their ability to transport people to distant, unexplored lands, and as a way to defend against external threats. Without spaceships, there would be no Star Trek, and by consequence, no human future in space. At least, that's the conventional thinking.


Full size
It's very unlikely, however, that space will be explored and colonized in this way. As science fiction writer Charles Stross has noted, the spaceship is a myth. It's an old-fangled vision of how humans might go about space travel that doesn't take into account the problems of distance, time and available resources — and of course, new innovations.


Instead, Stross and a number of other thinkers argue that it would be more realistic to drop the word "ship" from discussions of interstellar travel and instead contemplate the requirements for an "interstellar transportation system." An indisputable reality of space travel is that virtually nothing will await our intrepid explorers once they reach their destination — and that's assuming they could survive the journey. At best they could hope for are some rocks, sunlight, and slushy water. All materials required to build an initial infrastructure would have to be brought along for the ride — not an easy undertaking.


What Stross proposes is a system that utilizes machine-phase diamond-substrate nanotechnology, mind uploading, and artificial general intelligence. The end result wouldn't be much like a "ship". Rather, it would consist of a diamondoid data storage device (which would hold the data patterns of the uninstantiated space travelers) hanging below a light sail. The sail itself would be energized by lasers that are powered by huge orbiting solar power stations. Technically speaking, there would be no biological travelers aboard — just uploaded minds or some other kind of machine intelligence. Nanotech assemblers would take care of any need for physicality. Once at its destination, the device would come to a stop, settle on a planet, and go about the farming of materials to build a biosphere (or some kind of infrastructure), including a way to communicate back home.


So with my due apologies to Trekkies, no Galaxy Class Starship await your descendants.

Source: iO9
 
Last edited:
IMO we spend entirely too much money on trivial crap like famine and stuff. We should just funnel all that $$$ into building viable space craft so we can start colonising other worlds.

I actually agree with this. After the first man on the moon, the space race just suddenly died down. Imagine where it could have been had we actually been spending a decent amount of time on furthering space travel.

IMO, space travel should be of paramount importance on any nation's agenda.
 
I actually agree with this. After the first man on the moon, the space race just suddenly died down. Imagine where it could have been had we actually been spending a decent amount of time on furthering space travel.

IMO, space travel should be of paramount importance on any nation's agenda.

Indeed, whats the point of doing everything to make sure we dont wipe ourselves out if some cosmic fart does it for us because we are all crowded on this little ball of dust.
 
IMO we spend entirely too much money on trivial crap like famine and stuff. We should just funnel all that $$$ into building viable space craft so we can start colonising other worlds.
Well, I'm not so convinced about not spending cash on famine and similar humanitarian efforts, but I get where you coming from.

Although this kind of spending could rather be funneled into something awesome to advance our scientific awesomeness.
 
Back
Top