The question of Whether Booth Babes have a place at these expos is an entirely different one. The question in this thread is about the gaming media objectifying these women.
@ Graal. Another brilliant episode.
Well I like them and E3 and booth babes been one thing in my mind since I can remember.
As to your question, like I've said before you don't drink fanta expecting coke.
Games are made by "men" for "men" and until that changes we will have sexy-in-your-face and we can even take this further:
why is most lead roles in movies always male
why is most lead roles in series always male
why is most lead roles in <insert> always male
why must woman always be saved
why is men doing the saving
why is god male-fied
why is prophets all male
why is jesus male
why <insert> male / why <insert> not female
Just brings me back to:
"men" for "men" and woman and "woman" will always frown onto that rounded up by sex sells. Sex has been selling since dawn of men.
Does zuma's penis objectify me? Not if I don't give a fuck to put it blant. Does that mean that it is really the weaker sex that let them be influenced by this kak? Really?
What is stopping woman from releasing games for themselves? what is stopping them from upping the bar?
Is this all a case of rather sit on my fat-ass and /like or /unlike, because I'm to fucking lazy and it is rather easier to just blab about it and expect change?
I do feel an ere of over-sensitivity gone mental with the whim of sit-on-ass wait for change.
I read The Ninja, very violent very sexual and I pretty much enjoyed it. Did that objectify myself, woman or ninjas?
...maybe those tannies should keep away from games, hec maybe even life itself *shrugs*. YOU ARE ONLY INFLUENCED BY SOMETHING IF YOU LET IT AND NOTHING IS GOING TO CHANGE UNLESS YOU GET OF YOUR ARSE.
/shouting off
/spitting off
/hissing off
/ranty off
/gets on with fucking life
/ok rant now off
/cont. with desperate housewives