GTX 760 Ti, 770, 780 - Coming Soon

Glordit

Neo Zeon
http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/31286-gtx-760-ti-770-780-detailed\

Our sources were happy to share some additional details about Nvidia’s upcoming cards. It turns out that the GTX 760 Ti, the slowest of the bunch, is based on the GK104 225 chip. The GTX 750 Ti has a 256-bit memory interface and in reality represents a rebranded GTX 670. It looks dangerously similar to existing GTX 670 boards.
Add-in-board partners expect to start selling this card in the third week or June and they will be able to make their own custom cards. We don’t know much about performance but we expect it to be around GTX 670 levels. The Geforce GTX 770 is based on a somewhat faster GK 104 425 chip, again a 256-bit unit, and our sources are telling us that the card is more or less a GTX 680 renamed for 2013. Nvidia will allow AIBs to manufacture their original boards but the cooling solution on the card looks like the one from GTX Titan.

While I have learned to take some of fudzilla's reports with a pinch of salt, most of their reports are true.

So we looking at a rebranded 6 series, I can't say I am surprised.
The GTX 750 Ti has a 256-bit memory interface and in reality represents a rebranded GTX 670. It looks dangerously similar to existing GTX 670 boards.
Does this mean we will get a cheaper GTX670? (rebranded at a GTX750) Somehow I am doubtful.

http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/31305-nvidia-geforce-gtx-780-gtx-770-pixellized

geforce_780770leak_4.jpg

geforce_780770leak_1.jpg
 
Last edited:
*All re-brands* having at least 256 memory buss and not like those below the 670. I wonder if they actually fixed at hardware level the issues the 6xx range had without relying on driver fixes...
 
Last edited:
It turns out that the GTX 760 Ti, the slowest of the bunch, is based on the GK104 225 chip. The GTX 750 Ti has a 256-bit memory interface and in reality represents a rebranded GTX 670.

Surely this is an error? The 750ti should be the slowest of the bunch and the 760ti should be the rebranded 670.
 
What the hell is Nvidia trying to do suck, all the money out of consumers pockets with more expensive products that don't even increase the performance
 
What the hell is Nvidia trying to do suck, all the money out of consumers pockets with more expensive products that don't even increase the performance

Kepler is massively profitable. I'm sure Jen-Hsun has his reasons for simply rebranding while both AMD and Nvidia secretly prepare for the onslaught of 4K monitors in the next two years. AMD, instead of rebranding, chose to simply keep its lineup current and fill in some gaps with Tahiti LE and Bonaire.

No harm done by me from my point of view.
 
Kepler is massively profitable. I'm sure Jen-Hsun has his reasons for simply rebranding while both AMD and Nvidia secretly prepare for the onslaught of 4K monitors in the next two years. AMD, instead of rebranding, chose to simply keep its lineup current and fill in some gaps with Tahiti LE and Bonaire.

No harm done by me from my point of view.

Problem being at the moment 4k Screens cost more than a system even capable of running games on it's native resolution.
 
Problem being at the moment 4k Screens cost more than a system even capable of running games on it's native resolution.

True, although both companies probably have some data from Eyefinity and Surround users to show them how quickly they need to move for the next generation (Nvidia already crowdsources data using Geforce Experience).

If a small company like Seiki can already manufacture 50" TN panels that can do 4K at 30Hz and sell these with profitable margins for under $1500, you can bet that it'll be about two years before we can buy these here in SA at R10k and then prices will drop rapidly a year after that. Even Sony's going to be doing 4K content online through the SEN once the PS4 is out and about.
 
Back
Top