Test Tube Hamburger

Would you "Chow Down" on a labpatty

  • Not a chance - my body is a temple, all natural for me

    Votes: 6 23.1%
  • I'm game, i'll try anything once

    Votes: 9 34.6%
  • we should not be playing God, where do we draw the line

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • At last, some real headway in solving the worlds hunger problems

    Votes: 11 42.3%

  • Total voters
    26

JudeC

New member
The first reviews are in for test-tube hamburger meat, and the stuff apparently could use a little hamburger helper.



The burger was fried in a pan in London and served to two volunteers — American food author Josh Schonwald and Austrian food researcher Hanni Ruetzler. The Daily Mail in London reports that the duo’s reviews were mixed.

‘I was expecting the texture to be more soft… I know there is no fat in it so I didn’t know how juicy it would be,” said Ruetzler. “It’s close to meat. It’s not that juicy. The consistency is perfect.”


“The absence is the fat, it’s a leanness to it, but the bite feels like a conventional hamburger,” Schonwald told the Associated Press. He added that he had rarely tasted a hambuger, as he did on Monday, “without ketchup or onions or jalapenos or bacon.”



Professor Mark Post’s team at the University of Maastricht in the Netherlands conducted experiments which progressed from mouse meat to pork and finally beef, the Daily Mail reports.

“‘What we are going to attempt is important because I hope it will show cultured beef has the answers to major problems that the world faces,” Post said before the tasting began, citing the effort to feed the world and to combat climate change. Post said livestock farming is becoming unsustainable, with demand for meat rocketing around the world.

Don’t be expecting test-tube steaks anytime soon. Manufacturing steaks instead of minced meat presents a much greater technical challenge, requiring some kind of blood vessel system to carry nutrients and oxygen to the center of the tissue, Post told the Daily Mail. Making artificial chicken or fish from stem cells might be easier.

Monday’s taste test, coming after five years of research, is a key step toward making lab meat a culinary phenomenon. Post called it “a good start,” saying it was crucial that the burger has the “look, feel and taste like the real thing.”

Despite the tasters concern about flavor, scientists say that can be tweaked.



“Taste is the least (important) problem since this could be controlled by letting some of the stem cells develop into fat cells,” said Stig Omholt, director of biotechnology at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Adding fat to the burgers this way would probably be healthier than getting it from naturally chunky cows, Omholt said before Monday’s test. He was not involved in the project.

Post and colleagues made the meat from the muscle cells of two organic cows. The cells were put into a nutrient solution to help them develop into muscle tissue, growing into small strands of meat.

It took nearly 20,000 strands to make a single 5-ounce patty, which for Monday’s taste test was seasoned with salt, egg powder, breadcrumbs, red beet juice and saffron.

“I’m a vegetarian, but I would be first in line to try this,” said Jonathan Garlick, a stem cell researcher at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine in Boston. He has used similar techniques to make human skin but wasn’t involved in the burger research.

Experts say new ways of producing meat are needed to satisfy growing carnivorous appetites without exhausting resources. By 2050, the Food and Agriculture Organization predicts global meat consumption will double as more people in developing countries can afford it. Raising animals destined for the dinner table takes up about 70% of all agricultural land.

The animal rights group PETA has thrown its support behind the lab-meat initiative.

“As long as there’s anybody who’s willing to kill a chicken, a cow or a pig to make their meal, we are all for this,” said Ingrid Newkirk, PETA’s president and co-founder. “Instead of the millions and billions (of animals) being slaughtered now, we could just clone a few cells to make burgers or chops.”


http://tucsoncitizen.com/usa-today-news/2013/08/05/test-tube-hamburger-draws-mixed-reviews/
 
Poll options are strange...

I would try it and I love the progress, maybe soon we will slow down on the animal slaughter.
 
I chose the option everyone else chose, it would seem.

I don't mind it, however what comes out is the bigger question.
 
It is the next step from genetically modified stuff so definitely a no, I would rather make my own natural food.
 
Poll options are strange...

I would try it and I love the progress, maybe soon we will slow down on the animal slaughter.

Just noticed the poll... None of the above for me... :| (Would be No thanks, if the religious crap wasn't added :) )
 
Everything we pretty much eat these days is bad for you and processed and non organic blah blah blah... What else could go wrong :rolleyes:, I'd try it I don't care :p as long as it takes like a proper burger and not crap out of McDonalds I'm happy :D
 
Everything we pretty much eat these days is bad for you and processed and non organic blah blah blah... What else could go wrong :rolleyes:, I'd try it I don't care :p as long as it takes like a proper burger and not crap out of McDonalds I'm happy :D

Basically how I feel about it too. The chance at sustainable meat and hopefully cheaper for people, far outweighs the supposed cons.
 
McDonald's is amazing so shh

McDonalds is pretty average, I'll eat it but generally when I wanna go through drive-thru quickly.

Basically how I feel about it too. The chance at sustainable meat and hopefully cheaper for people, far outweighs the supposed cons.

Exactly, our bodies have adapted pretty much to what we consume on a daily basis. what's adding one more ingredient to the picture :rolleyes:
 
I don't think I'd eat what they've achieved to make so far, but when they get it to taste good, I might give it a shot. At least it's a good start to what might one day end up helping with starvation, and unsustainable farming
 
I'm all for it.

If it leads to fewer animals needing to be slaughtered for people to get their meat kicks, then I wholly support it.

I have no issue with eating meat, I do, however, have an issue with killing a living, breathing, feeling sentient creature for "food" when there are so many viable alternatives around.

Now, if we could only get one of those snappy food synthesizers from Star Trek, we'll all be sorted.
 
I am not sure if I would, I think I would prefer to wait a while till its perfected before trying it out.
 
I like the idea, theoretically....

my biggest worry would be 10 years later when they say oops, we didn't realise it gives you cancer, sorry
 
I think it's all good. this has many potential advantages; less hunger, less unsustainable farming and remember kids that global warming is caused also by many many cow farts so there'll be less of them too.
 
I think it's all good. this has many potential advantages; less hunger, less unsustainable farming and remember kids that global warming is caused also by many many cow farts so there'll be less of them too.

I am tempted to make a remark about your username and said topic :p
 
I think it's all good. this has many potential advantages; less hunger, less unsustainable farming and remember kids that global warming is caused also by many many cow farts so there'll be less of them too.

No doubt you have a point, but the cost seems a little prohibitive, I don't really think this is the breakthrough the world thinks it is.

just cause we can doesn't mean we are going to if it costs 300 000 pounds for a patty, I reckon you could buy quite a few cows for that
 
It sounds vile; I will never eat one. If it somehow reduces strain on agricultural production to feed livestock, then it might be a good stepping stone toward getting humanity off this kick of consuming the dead flesh of other mammals.

We can farm more than enough wholesome food to solve world hunger problems, but because mass-market consumer mentality doesn't have people thinking further than their next fix of a chemical-laden MercDernalds "meat" burger, a lot of that food goes toward raising livestock.
 
Back
Top