Jozi bouncer attacks alleged weed smokers - Stones Fourways

James

James

MyGaming Alumnus
Jozi Bouncer Attacks Stoners | My City By Night

Allegedly, Shane Myburgh, A “Back up” bouncer at Stones Fourways in Johannesburg South Africa, doesn’t even confront the group of young adults smoking weed in the restroom. In typical juice head style he sees it acceptable to just attack them with no provocation.

His Facebook statements hold no remorse for his actions or the possible consequences there of. The weed smokers would get off with less of a charge, he on the other hand could be in serious trouble but he doesn’t care, anyone who speaks out against him slandering them with homophobic slurs.

What makes it funny is that this is how angry he gets about guys doing drugs where he works but it wouldn’t surprise anyone if this guy does numerous steroids to fuel his ego.
Click to expand...

Video here: http://www.mycitybynight.co.za/jozi-bouncer-attacks-stoners/
 
Hmm i will be honest in saying i am confused about something. Not too long ago we saw a video of a school boy swearing and throwing things at a high school teacher, i saw a lot of comments about how he should have received a hiding etc etc for it (i for one voted that too)

We see this video now and the remarks again are against the person who is dishing out violence, this time to some young kids allegedly smoking weed, who is in the wrong?

It begs the question really that are we as humans really upset about the wrong doing or rather the protection of those against physical violence?

If those lighties were smoking pot AND in a public place, they enter under the house rules and the bouncers job is to protect everyone at that club (i dont give a damn about his personality or history) and if his way of dealing with drugs etc is in the form of violence then so be it, i am not condoning it but i hope those kids learned a lesson they wont forget soon.

I am interested to know if it was Dagga and what the club is doing to stop this from happening in their establishment again.
 
Roomys_ZA said:
Hmm i will be honest in saying i am confused about something. Not too long ago we saw a video of a school boy swearing and throwing things at a high school teacher, i saw a lot of comments about how he should have received a hiding etc etc for it (i for one voted that too)

We see this video now and the remarks again are against the person who is dishing out violence, this time to some young kids allegedly smoking weed, who is in the wrong?

It begs the question really that are we as humans really upset about the wrong doing or rather the protection of those against physical violence?

If those lighties were smoking pot AND in a public place, they enter under the house rules and the bouncers job is to protect everyone at that club (i dont give a damn about his personality or history) and if his way of dealing with drugs etc is in the form of violence then so be it, i am not condoning it but i hope those kids learned a lesson they wont forget soon.

I am interested to know if it was Dagga and what the club is doing to stop this from happening in their establishment again.
Click to expand...

I see what you are saying. But I have to say that was a MOERSE pakslae. '6 van die bestes' with a sjambok would have sufficed. That was a knockout blow and that okes head was bouncing off the basin.
 
What is disturbing here is that you are condoning violence for something as stupid as smoking weed ...... by all means, call the cops or throw them out or call their parents, etc etc but where do you get off saying they deserved any type of smack? Can I come to your home and smack your children or wife or grandmother? Why not, they may deserve it apparently.

Really really grates my fucken gherkin.
 
Mephisto_Helix said:
What is disturbing here is that you are condoning violence for something as stupid as smoking weed ...... by all means, call the cops or throw them out or call their parents, etc etc but where do you get off saying they deserved any type of smack? Can I come to your home and smack your children or wife or grandmother? Why not, they may deserve it apparently.

Really really grates my fucken gherkin.
Click to expand...

You should see that image Tsar posted.


Look at the comments on his facebook profile, and that dumb as stone chick who keeps fueling his steroid fed ego. Man, it's scary what type of people are walking freely in this world.

@Roomys:

It's not about that dude. There's better ways of dealing with this type of thing. Keep them there and call the cops, or get in touch of their parents. I'm sure the parents would want to punish them themselves instead of having some low-IQ, orangutang, roid-raged mofo beat up their kids at the whim of a whiff.
 
Mephisto_Helix said:
What is disturbing here is that you are condoning violence for something as stupid as smoking weed ...... by all means, call the cops or throw them out or call their parents, etc etc but where do you get off saying they deserved any type of smack? Can I come to your home and smack your children or wife or grandmother? Why not, they may deserve it apparently.

Really really grates my fucken gherkin.
Click to expand...

You and me both. I mean I bet you he wouldn't do a thing to the coke and kat heads. The fact is these guys where skinny and he knew they prob won't do a thing to him and he just wanted to do it for shits and giggles. look how his girlfriend laughed at them

@tooks totally right. But this just makes me dislike people even more. They didn't do anything that was hurting anyone else.
 
Here's my 2 cents

The entrance looks like it's there at the bottom of the screen plus the commentary says that guys was gonna leave. Therefore that bouncer came in from the left so there might have been stall or something there where the bouncer would have been.

How do we not know the bouncer wasn't there from the start, or at least there for a while. Maybe those guys joking around saying those stupid roid bunny bouncers will never catch us in here and so on.

My 2c
 
Ike_009 said:
Here's my 2 cents

The entrance looks like it's there at the bottom of the screen plus the commentary says that guys was gonna leave. Therefore that bouncer came in from the left so there might have been stall or something there where the bouncer would have been.

How do we not know the bouncer wasn't there from the start, or at least there for a while. Maybe those guys joking around saying those stupid roid bunny bouncers will never catch us in here and so on.

My 2c
Click to expand...

I doubt it. They prob saying how good the cronic is. Still even if they were no reason to attack them like that.
 
Tsar said:
I doubt it. They prob saying how good the cronic is. Still even if they were no reason to attack them like that.
Click to expand...

I'm not supporting his actions I'm just saying that if my theory on what happened holds water that I can understand said bouncers reaction. I mean if I was duty and had to listen to some kids insulting me over my job I would also be pissed.
 
Again i will say i do not condone what he did, as well as that WE would not act in such a way, but this is not the case. It is easy for us watching on the outskirts to have an opinion on whats right and why he was wrong etc. But as i stated its house rules and the bouncer was sorting out a problem or a potential problem he did not like.

I was merely pointing out how we call for a bliksem on a lighty in school being a little shite, but when its a bigger "bully" on small (kids?) potentially doing wrong we have the opposite outlook.

I fully believe that there was a possible better way of handling it, but it was not me to do so neither was it anyone else here, he dealt with it the way he knows how.

Hope i am not misunderstood in this, i do not condone violence of children etc ffs...
 
Last edited:
Ike_009 said:
I'm not supporting his actions I'm just saying that if my theory on what happened holds water that I can understand said bouncers reaction. I mean if I was duty and had to listen to some kids insulting me over my job I would also be pissed.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't attack them I would grab them and throw them out.
 
The level of stupidity displayed in assaulting people (3 x charges of assault, gg), going back the day afterwards to video the assault as recorded on CCTV, posting it to FB AND then threatening people posting about it is truly staggering.

Also, the level of stupidity of the other 'boets' posting about it on FB? *shakes head*
 
GReeN_ORB said:
The level of stupidity displayed in assaulting people (3 x charges of assault, gg), going back the day afterwards to video the assault as recorded on CCTV, posting it to FB AND then threatening people posting about it is truly staggering.

Also, the level of stupidity of the other 'boets' posting about it on FB? *shakes head*
Click to expand...

My IQ dropped from reading that screenshot of the FB comments.
 
Roomys_ZA said:
Again i will say i do not condone what he did, as well as that WE would not act in such a way, but this is not the case. It is easy for us watching on the outskirts to have an opinion on whats right and why he was wrong etc. But as i stated its house rules and the bouncer was sorting out a problem or a potential problem he did not like.

I was merely pointing out how we call for a bliksem on a lighty in school being a little shite, but when its a bigger "bully" on small (kids?) potentially doing wrong we have the opposite outlook.

I fully believe that there was a possible better way of handling it, but it was not me to do so neither was it anyone else here, he dealt with it the way he knows how.

Hope i am not misunderstood in this, i do not condone violence of children etc ffs...
Click to expand...

I can see you don't condone it, but this which you just said bring the discussion to another avenue, which is- the house rules. Cool, so that's the house rules to PK some poor lighty. But why have we come this far only to still be behaving in such savage and violent ways? THERE IS NO need for violent behavior. Maybe in extreme cases where you have to defend yourself, like in a war, but PK'ing a few lighties over something that could EASILY be handled otherwise just shows you what this person's outlook is.

And if the video is not enough evidence of this guy's steroid-fueled rage, go have a look at his facebook wall and the comments made there by himself. He confronts a few people on there, of which some of them seem to come across as more than reasonable, but he still proceeds to call them c**ts and all sorts of other things on a public forum.

I'm sorry, I don't care which way you look at this- from his boets' view, or from the general public, like all of us- but this guy really seems like a raging bigot that deserves to be charged with assault.

TheAvenged87 said:
My IQ dropped from reading that screenshot of the FB comments.
Click to expand...

Hell yeah, I felt the same way after that. But then I regained my mind and felt enraged and ashamed of being a human.
 
to0kenZA said:
I can see you don't condone it, but this which you just said bring the discussion to another avenue, which is- the house rules. Cool, so that's the house rules to PK some poor lighty. But why have we come this far only to still be behaving in such savage and violent ways? THERE IS NO need for violent behavior. Maybe in extreme cases where you have to defend yourself, like in a war, but PK'ing a few lighties over something that could EASILY be handled otherwise just shows you what this person's outlook is.

And if the video is not enough evidence of this guy's steroid-fueled rage, go have a look at his facebook wall and the comments made there by himself. He confronts a few people on there, of which some of them seem to come across as more than reasonable, but he still proceeds to call them c**ts and all sorts of other things on a public forum.

I'm sorry, I don't care which way you look at this- from his boets' view, or from the general public, like all of us- but this guy really seems like a raging bigot that deserves to be charged with assault.



Hell yeah, I felt the same way after that. But then I regained my mind and felt enraged and ashamed of being a human.
Click to expand...

Sure i completely 100% agree that he should be charged with assault, just because i mentioned house rules etc again does not mean i condone it.

Ill stop commenting now on this, have tons of work to do.
 
Based on what I can see in the video, this is flatout assault. There is no clear provocation (and verbal provocation isn't usually enough to justify 'self-defense'), and it definitely wasn't self-defense.

Whatever you may or may not think about drugs (I'm not a fan, meself), there is still NO justification nor excuse for the way this boet acted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top