Dont buy 1st batch of Nvidia's new card!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter BlaQ_PhoeniX1
  • Start date Start date
B

BlaQ_PhoeniX1

Guest
The long list of unfavorable developments caused by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) has just increased by one, as reports say that the latest episode in the 40nm yields saga has NVIDIA faced with tight supply. Apparently, the situation at TSMC is so dire that NVIDIA can't even get enough CUDA cores for its GeForce GTX 470 and 480 cards. Having initially planned on a higher number of such cores on each device, the Santa Clara graphics processing unit maker is now forced to settle for fewer.

Digitimes reports that TSMC's 40nm yields are still under 50%, even though the semiconductor manufacturer was previously revealed to have gotten over most problems. Nevertheless, this doesn't seem to be the case, with the most immediate effect being the reduced number of CUDA cores on both the GTX 400 series adapters. The GeForce GTX 480, for instance, was initially planned to have no less than 512 CUDA cores but, at least the first batch of cards, will only boast 480. The GTX 470 will also only have 448 Cores. This means that, essentially, NVIDIA's cards will be somewhat weaker because of tight chip supply.

The report states that, according to the same sources, TSMC's low yields will also be the main factor behind the reduced initial availability of the two graphics adapters. While the official announcement will be made on March 26, volume shipments won't actually start before April 6. Of course, NVIDIA chose not to comment on products that have not yet been announced.

Hearing that the first batch of Fermi will be less potent than originally planned will most likely stir dissatisfaction in performance enthusiasts. It seems that the only consolation these consumers will have consists of the lower-than-expected price tags of $349 for the GTX 470 and $499 for the GTX 480.
 
Yeah that is sad if its true, but it some how just make believing everything you read not viable, if there is no official annoucement or a valid source, then the information can be regard as a rumour or speculation. Not that it is easy to infer any different.
 
1268685001151.jpg
 
Lets wait and see. I don't have much faith that these cards are going to be very impressive, but I'm not jumping to conclusions until I start seeing some benchmarks.
 
Source?

That reads like something Charlie wrote for Semi-Accurate...

I've read most of this stuff online on other sites, pretty sure its mostly true.

Fudzilla has confirmed (they claim as fact) that the GTX480 has been neutered to 480 shaders, cutting the TDP to 250W:

http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/18170/34/

And also that the TSMC yields are in fact still under 50%:

http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/18172/34/

Charlie has been pretty quiet lately actually, probably working on something big and semi-accurate ;)

Also, the March 26 launch is pretty much known by now to be a paper launch, availability issues are Fermi's worst kept secret ;)

Oh, and this is the thread starter's original source (I think):

http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20100322PD205.html
 
Last edited:
I've read most of this stuff online on other sites, pretty sure its mostly true.

Fudzilla has confirmed (they claim as fact) that the GTX480 has been neutered to 480 shaders, cutting the TDP to 250W:

http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/18170/34/

And also that the TSMC yields are in fact still under 50%:

http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/18172/34/

Charlie has been pretty quiet lately actually, probably working on something big and semi-accurate ;)

Also, the March 26 launch is pretty much known by now to be a paper launch, availability issues are Fermi's worst kept secret ;)

Oh, and this is the thread starter's original source (I think):

http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20100322PD205.html

Thanks for the info :)

Fudzilla basically quotes Digitimes in their article, so we'll have to take Digitimes as the proper source of the info. Which isn't a bad thing :)
 
i think i'm going to skip the gtx 4 series for now until they fix it up or go with the gtx 5 series next year n hopefully they fix it then. Nvidia is slacking at the momoment.
 
TSMC is the problem, not Nvidia, I'd hate it if that were my product....eish. Unfair to say it's Nvidia's fault IMHO

ATi have been using the same TSMC 40nm process. Their engineering worked around TSMC's limitations and their GPU's turned out great. Nvidia wanted to build the biggest, hottest, most intricate chip ever on an imperfect manufacturing process. Who's to blame?

BTW people i'm new here so hello :)... whose charlie BTW?

Charlie is the man who doesn't like Nvida very much, although he usually has a reason for doing so (but he does go overboard sometimes). He was on www.theinq.net but then he started www.semiaccurate.com, which is where he publishes all his latest CPU/GPU/ general computing news. (And they tend to be "Very-accurate" much more than "SemiAccurate", which is also a play on Semiconductor.)

LOL they already skipped the GTX300 series

GT300 is used for rebranded mid-range GT200 chips (shrunk to 40nm) and shoved into notebooks.
 
Last edited:
I'd say a more justifiable reason not to buy the "first batch of nvidia cards" is quite simply: ATI is currently better, get one of those instead.
 
Back
Top