Fist of Jesus

czc said:
That would be getting to the level of censorship then.
Click to expand...

So add a warning to the page then that some users might find it offensive. Just like NSFW.

Saint_Dee said:
And that is the dangerous territory my argument alludes to... If you start cherry picking your content/news coverage because a group might find the fact that you're covering said news might add on to the potential offensive affront by the subject matter to a particular group, then who is to say which group doesn't get this consideration. Who makes that call? Because then we get into the territory of a group hierarchy, and that, ladies and gentlemen is dangerous and risky territory. One could argue that the manner of coverage or the way the articles are written could be different, but that's another subjective topic for another thread.

I'm not saying people shouldn't be offended that the subject matter gets covered, what I'm saying is they shouldn't expect the subject matter not to be covered if it's within the parameters of the entity covering it.
Click to expand...

Do you have any problem with the free publicity that they are receiving after intentionally choosing something controversial? If something isn't done to prevent this the next group will just do something even more controversial and then more controversial...

Or alternatively, it's very plausible that there are some minors reading this site. Does that mean that we can go all-out and ignore the fact that a sub-set of the community might be minors and show full-frontal adult content and beheadings?
 
Last edited:
Wyzak said:
Nor am I. In fact who here will?
Click to expand...

I think regardless of who will or wont. Thanks to the title and heated arguments on the interwebz enough people out there will buy the game and probably justify the next game called "Fisting Mary" or something...
 
Lothy said:
I think regardless of who will or wont. Thanks to the title and heated arguments on the interwebz enough people out there will buy the game and probably justify the next game called "Fisting Mary" or something...
Click to expand...

Chances are higher of people pirating it,would be a nice hard deserved slap in the developers face.
 
Snoopimaru said:
I dunno, I don't think Indie titles are as prone to being pirated as your A-list games.
Click to expand...

True.Still,i wouldn't shell out any cash for this game.Either the devs are desperate for money or they made it as a joke.

The fact that it's on steam boggles the mind though...
 
Solitude said:
Haha Graal, I can see why you have been banned from MyBroadband.
Click to expand...

Hint: My account was banned by my own request.

It's fun to make assumptions, isn't it? ;)

You are a difficult person to deal with. I've explained exactly why it can be found to be offensive. I understand why you feel Christians shouldn't find it offensive but I find it a bit disappointing that you do not have the insight to see their point of view.

The fact that these posts have been going in circles is not just because of me but because you would not accept my points.
Click to expand...

Fair enough, I guess I'm not going to get any concrete, logical reasons out of you other than "it's offensive because it's a mockery and it's a mockery because it's offensive." Let's just agree to disagree then. You have your right to be offended, after all. Just don't expect everyone to take it seriously.

Wyzak said:
Do you have any problem with the free publicity that they are receiving after intentionally choosing something controversial? If something isn't done to prevent this the next group will just do something even more controversial and then more controversial...

Or alternatively, it's very plausible that there are some minors reading this site. Does that mean that we can go all-out and ignore the fact that a sub-set of the community might be minors and show full-frontal adult content and beheadings?
Click to expand...

Erm, how about no? If we were to censor things that some people might find offensive then MyGaming wouldn't have anything to cover. Oh, someone doesn't like the idea of hell and demons in videogames? Guess that rules out any coverage on Doom 4. Someone doesn't like the idea of violent crime in videogames? Oh well, bye bye Grand Theft Auto coverage.
 
This might offend people but honestly its freedom of speech. Censorship is nonsense.

Like that game hatred its their right to make that game. like its these peoples right to make this game.

It looks like shit but its part of life. Lots of things will offend someone,I wonder how many people would be offended if it was buddha? or the Indian gods? or Muhammad? But no one is forcing anyone to buy it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top