Nvidia unveils GeForce GTX Titan X

Ah shit. Sorry about that. I did the search, found nothing. Then started typing and stuff. I must have searched right before Kevin posted it. [MENTION=289]Jan[/MENTION] [MENTION=8764]Kevin[/MENTION] please delete this thread, sorry.
 
Blazzok said:
Ah shit. Sorry about that. I did the search, found nothing. Then started typing and stuff. I must have searched right before Kevin posted it. [MENTION=289]Jan[/MENTION] [MENTION=8764]Kevin[/MENTION] please delete this thread, sorry.
Click to expand...

Merging it so that your shame (and post count) remain ;D
 
nah nvidis lost this round, its a 3072 cuda core card, 12gb vram and 384 bit bus whils a card that matches the specs of the titan x the r9 390 will have 3072 stream processors 512 bit bus and 4gb vram and the gpu of the year r9 390x which was powering the steam vr demo will have over 4000 cores hbm(9 times faster than the memory titan and 980ti will use), and a 4096 bit bus. nvida has been stomped.
 
The price of this will more than likely be closer to 2 gajillion rand. NVIDIA prices for their ultra flagships are always reasonable
 
Jan said:
Merging it so that your shame (and post count) remain ;D
Click to expand...

Haha, how nice (and devious) of you :D

d3athron3d said:
nah nvidis lost this round, its a 3072 cuda core card, 12gb vram and 384 bit bus whils a card that matches the specs of the titan x the r9 390 will have 3072 stream processors 512 bit bus and 4gb vram and the gpu of the year r9 390x which was powering the steam vr demo will have over 4000 cores hbm(9 times faster than the memory titan and 980ti will use), and a 4096 bit bus. nvida has been stomped.
Click to expand...

I'd still wait for official word from AMD regarding the specs of the 300 series, so far it is only rumours. After that reviews will show who wins what. Also, that last bit about the 4096 bit bus, is just not possible. I'm sure you made some kind of typo. At most it will be a 512 bit bus.
 
Throwing some shit into the wind; personally from the research I've done and input people have given, I consider the GTX 970 to be an excellent performance card (if not the best) vs the amount of monies you paying for it. (ie. best bang for buck).

Thoughts / opinions ?

reason this comes up is I have a [-]discussion[/-] argument going on Facebook with a few friends. :p
 
BeoTeK said:
Throwing some shit into the wind; personally from the research I've done and input people have given, I consider the GTX 970 to be an excellent performance card (if not the best) vs the amount of monies you paying for it. (ie. best bang for buck).

Thoughts / opinions ?

reason this comes up is I have a [-]discussion[/-] argument going on Facebook with a few friends. :p
Click to expand...

Without a doubt Beo you are correct. It has been posted on the forums before as well, but for the money the 970 is unbeatable. The problem with the card is not the "3.5GB VRAM", it is the fact that Nvidia hid it and the false advertising.

The fact that they lied does not detract from the card's performance. The benchmarks that were run are a true reflection of the cards power and no one can dispute that. It's not like the benchmark programs went: "Oh look, it says 4GB RAM on the box, thus the performance should be great". They test with what the card physically has.

If you're gaming at 1080p this is the best card for the money.
 
In it's price range regardless of marketing flops the 970 looks a awesome prospect for it's money and the reviews prove it
 
the r9 390x specs are condirmed since last year on sisoft sandra database, they leaked a presentation thats supposed to happen today for asus, msi etc. the r9 390x will come in 2 variants the r9 390 with 4gb hbm and 3072 same cores as titan x which will battle with titan x and 980ti(gimped titan). and amd will debut their flagship with the r9 390x wce(google it) with 4096 stream processors and a 8916 bus with. and the card already has good reviews. it was powering oculus rift.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top