Those password strength meters are actually useless

Filling in random letters doesn't help me remember my millions of passwords. Instead... I make sentences. I find them easier to remember.
I'm someone who forgets very easily, so making sentences is a preferable choice.
 
Last edited:
Filling in random letters doesn't help me remember my millions of passwords. Instead... I make sentences. I find them easier to remember.
I'm someone who forgets very easily, so making sentences is a preferable choice.

When sites allow it, this is the best practice. Easy to remember and difficult to force-attack.
Well done, [MENTION=12147]Hagan[/MENTION] .

Problem is that some sites still force you to follow the "1 special character, 1 numeric, 1 uppercase" rule. And in my opinion these rules actually gives a blueprint for hackers on the password structure.
 
When sites allow it, this is the best practice. Easy to remember and difficult to force-attack.
Well done, [MENTION=12147]Hagan[/MENTION] .

Problem is that some sites still force you to follow the "1 special character, 1 numeric, 1 uppercase" rule. And in my opinion these rules actually gives a blueprint for hackers on the password structure.

I add in these CAPS, NUM3R4L5 & $pec*als, to form the sentence, if that is what the requirement is.
:)
 
The more complicated a password is the more likely it is to be compromised as you won't be able to remember it and therefore have to write it down


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The more complicated a password is the more likely it is to be compromised as you won't be able to remember it and therefore have to write it down


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And unless you work the for CIA, NSA or some other sort of secret illuminati group, noone is going to break into your house and steal the gibberish you've written down on a notepad shoved in a drawer somewhere :p

Writing it down is actually not as "vulnerable" as people think. I'd say its more secure than using lastpass, seeing as lastpass is a target...my house isn't :D
 
And unless you work the for CIA, NSA or some other sort of secret illuminati group, noone is going to break into your house and steal the gibberish you've written down on a notepad shoved in a drawer somewhere :p

Writing it down is actually not as "vulnerable" as people think. I'd say its more secure than using lastpass, seeing as lastpass is a target...my house isn't :D

Exactly, I cringe every time someone recommends lastpass. Its only a matter of time until it gets broken into and everyone's passwords go public. Don't trust others with your security.

Also, put your written passwords in a sealed envelope, so you know if its been tampered with. Keep two copies in seperate secure locations, so if one gets stolen, you can still get in to change all of them.
 
The problem is two-fold. While a password like 1ChickenPie500Coke&Chips=H@ppiN355 is in theory a good password it becomes useless if (1) you use it in more than one location (2) a location saves it using reversible encryption or uses a weak cipher.

Plenty of recent "hacks" have been due to passwords being hashed using MD5 (which is cool, but you can decrypt MD5 hashes in about 2 seconds these days), the other culprit is SHA-1 which is very breakable.
 
I think I may have changed all passwords from LastPass. So even if it's leaked, I ought to be safe.
What's more? I cannot remember my master password and as such cannot even log in anymore.
 
This is an Ars article from 2013. It shows how using random word combo passwords like "bananastaplehorse" (even with symbols and numbers thrown in) can be cracked without too much effort.

http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/05/how-crackers-make-minced-meat-out-of-your-passwords/3/

Ja, this is where the xkcd example I posted falls over a bit. The comic assumes that a brute force attack will guess each letter, which leads to the high entropy bit count, where in reality dictionary attacks will mean that each word (or major syllable) would be a bit of entropy. It's still my preferred starting point, since it's all relative anyway, as [MENTION=6600]PsychoFish[/MENTION] was alluding to.

Well, gfycat essentially uses this system to generate unique URLs and it seems to be working brilliantly for them

Not quite the same. gfyCat has a very specific URL generation format that goes <adjective><adjective><animal>. The reason comes down to easier reproduction for humans, rather than the added benefit of easier memorization.
 
Back
Top