RyanBrothwell
New member
Those password strength meters are actually useless
Can we actually trust those password "strength" meters?
Can we actually trust those password "strength" meters?
Filling in random letters doesn't help me remember my millions of passwords. Instead... I make sentences. I find them easier to remember.
I'm someone who forgets very easily, so making sentences is a preferable choice.
When sites allow it, this is the best practice. Easy to remember and difficult to force-attack.
Well done, [MENTION=12147]Hagan[/MENTION] .
Problem is that some sites still force you to follow the "1 special character, 1 numeric, 1 uppercase" rule. And in my opinion these rules actually gives a blueprint for hackers on the password structure.
I add in these CAPS, NUM3R4L5 & $pec*als, to form the sentence, if that is what the requirement is.
![]()
The more complicated a password is the more likely it is to be compromised as you won't be able to remember it and therefore have to write it down
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And unless you work the for CIA, NSA or some other sort of secret illuminati group, noone is going to break into your house and steal the gibberish you've written down on a notepad shoved in a drawer somewhere
Writing it down is actually not as "vulnerable" as people think. I'd say its more secure than using lastpass, seeing as lastpass is a target...my house isn't![]()
This is an Ars article from 2013. It shows how using random word combo passwords like "bananastaplehorse" (even with symbols and numbers thrown in) can be cracked without too much effort.
http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/05/how-crackers-make-minced-meat-out-of-your-passwords/3/
Well, gfycat essentially uses this system to generate unique URLs and it seems to be working brilliantly for them