When I saw it last night I was like OMG.
A little undecided at the moment. Latency is very important for me, so it all depends on what other MyBB folks think of itFrom what I've seen so far it's nothing to write home about latency-wise, but uncapped for R399 regardless is freaking legend. I could very well see myself getting it.
I'm rather keen for this one - I don't do AS much online gaming anymore, since i'm focusing on my SP range...but it would be alot kief to restart my series downloads like I did back in the days of uncapped wireless...
Ok - I've just read through all 41 pages of the discussion thread.
It seems people have very mixed responses to the quality of the 384 lines. Also some issues regarding NAT and access to specific sites and whatnot.
Others say speeds are fine vs some comparing it to dialup (affected by the upstream they're pulling from?) so I'm going to wait a bit and see.
My biggest concern is if I cancel my 10GB Afrihost account and sign up for it now and it ends up sucking the bum, then to reapply for the Afrihost one will no longer be at the R290 special rate, but the more expensive one. :/
EDIT: Afrihost's R29/GB special is _STILL_ running it seems.
Ok - I've just read through all 41 pages of the discussion thread.
It seems people have very mixed responses to the quality of the 384 lines. Also some issues regarding NAT and access to specific sites and whatnot.
Others say speeds are fine vs some comparing it to dialup (affected by the upstream they're pulling from?) so I'm going to wait a bit and see.
My biggest concern is if I cancel my 10GB Afrihost account and sign up for it now and it ends up sucking the bum, then to reapply for the Afrihost one will no longer be at the R290 special rate, but the more expensive one. :/
EDIT: Afrihost's R29/GB special is _STILL_ running it seems.
I signed up... Not 100% happy the Nating is a real problem, latencies arent bad in games when I was playing HON I was getting between 65 and 150 on local servers.
Bit of a waste on my 4mb line though...
Can you explain the nat problem a little bit? I spend about R430 a month on bandwidth as it is now, so this is definitely I am considering.
howzit
We have reverted to a NAT'ed network because we realized that some service
providers can't advertise our IP 's yet and that is why some web sites
couldn't be opened. The reason for this is that some of our peering partners
need to complete upgrades so that they can support our 4-Byte ASN. we
decided to convert to a 32-bit AS Number now instead of
a 16-bit AS Number because of expected ASN shortage in the 16-bit range
around the year 2010. We are probably the first to run a 4 Byte AS and some
of the older providers still run 2 Byte AS.
The majority of the providers we are waiting for are local as all the
international links are registered.
For 99% of our clients NAT'ing for a short while (probably till early next
week) while we contact those providers that can't broadcast our routes yet to fix this is not an issue.
For those that find this an issue we will happily cancel you application.
Can you explain the nat problem a little bit? I spend about R430 a month on bandwidth as it is now, so this is definitely I am considering.