try and understand
This is why unions are a waste of time, and unions are a high factor when it comes to the problems with which this country is facing when it boils down to the economical crisis and what's really going on.
As soon as someone says that, you know you are going to get "tightened".
So what do you suggest people do if they feel they are being exploited and management tells them to "try and understand"?
You see, this part is where the system breaks down. And to most people this is just not acceptable.I would have to just deal with it.
As soon as someone says that, you know you are going to get "tightened".
So what do you suggest people do if they feel they are being exploited and management tells them to "try and understand"?
You see, this part is where the system breaks down. And to most people this is just not acceptable.
I'm going to throw in my 2c for the record.
I don't think that there can or should be total equality, just because employees themselves are not equal. Some people are hard working, efficient workers who care about the quality of their work, while others slack off and just turn up so they can get paid. Why should they get paid the same?
Also, paying everyone the same regardless of skill or productivity removes any incentive for people to try and actually do their job well.
I'm not saying that people should be trodden on or be paid unfairly low wages, which does happen, but that quality employees should be rewarded as such. Sure if wages are ridiculously low, the minimum wage should be upped to a reasonable level, but to just say that everyone should get the same amount regardless is unfair to those who deserve more, and who could be paid more if management didn't have to give everyone else a raise too.
This is why communism never worked out
Exactly, it be quite wrong to pay an employee R1 and another one R1 for the same job when the first one gives a lot more work done first time right without delay.
Exactly hence where Performance and Salary reviews come into play and that's my whole argument as to why Unions are a complete waste of time, and the thing is if the workers actually stopped and thought about it, they would realize that they are screwing themselves over worse than if they had reviews on an annual basis. I can tell you now and bet you that there are guys there that work extremely hard and probably a lot harder than others and yet they are getting the same shitty salary as their colleague who is just too damn lazy to care much for his job.
You are dead on.Exactly hence where Performance and Salary reviews come into play and that's my whole argument as to why Unions are a complete waste of time, and the thing is if the workers actually stopped and thought about it, they would realize that they are screwing themselves over worse than if they had reviews on an annual basis. I can tell you now and bet you that there are guys there that work extremely hard and probably a lot harder than others and yet they are getting the same shitty salary as their colleague who is just too damn lazy to care much for his job.
I guess so, there's always going to be the slackers...but its rife in the public sector.This doesn't happen only in the public sector. at my work (corporate company) same thing is happening, colleagues who are doing the exact same work as me + f'in lazy gets more money! I don't understand it.
As soon as someone says that, you know you are going to get "tightened".
So what do you suggest people do if they feel they are being exploited and management tells them to "try and understand"?
+1Here's another big problem with these kinds of mass strikes. A very small wage increase, say a few hundred Rand per person, across an entire industry segment can potentially cost billions, let alone the cost to GDP from the strikes (plus all the sympathy strikes), and the cost of repairing the damage that is often caused. These costs are paid for by taxpayers and consumers. The general cost of living goes up, and the people who needed the money in the first place end up worse than they were before and now they are underpaid again, so they strike again. It's a vicious cycle.
Here's another big problem with these kinds of mass strikes. A very small wage increase, say a few hundred Rand per person, across an entire industry segment can potentially cost billions, let alone the cost to GDP from the strikes (plus all the sympathy strikes), and the cost of repairing the damage that is often caused. These costs are paid for by taxpayers and consumers. The general cost of living goes up, and the people who needed the money in the first place end up worse than they were before and now they are underpaid again, so they strike again. It's a vicious cycle.
the guys currently striking just burned down 3 train coaches this morning in CPT.
I agree they only see money and not the consequences of their actions.
That sucks I think strikers who vandalise should do lots of community service or go to jail for 3 months. It should stop them from trying to do it again hopefully.